Title |
Endothelial tubes assemble from intracellular vacuoles in vivo
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, June 2006
|
DOI | 10.1038/nature04923 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Makoto Kamei, W. Brian Saunders, Kayla J. Bayless, Louis Dye, George E. Davis, Brant M. Weinstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | <1% |
Unknown | 468 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 133 | 27% |
Researcher | 87 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 56 | 11% |
Student > Master | 41 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 26 | 5% |
Other | 79 | 16% |
Unknown | 72 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 170 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 110 | 22% |
Engineering | 49 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 9% |
Chemistry | 7 | 1% |
Other | 28 | 6% |
Unknown | 85 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,950,829
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#42,564
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,705
of 90,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#106
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.