↓ Skip to main content

Endothelial tubes assemble from intracellular vacuoles in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
432 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
494 Mendeley
connotea
4 Connotea
Title
Endothelial tubes assemble from intracellular vacuoles in vivo
Published in
Nature, June 2006
DOI 10.1038/nature04923
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Kamei, W. Brian Saunders, Kayla J. Bayless, Louis Dye, George E. Davis, Brant M. Weinstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 468 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 133 27%
Researcher 87 18%
Student > Bachelor 56 11%
Student > Master 41 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 5%
Other 79 16%
Unknown 72 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 170 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 110 22%
Engineering 49 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 9%
Chemistry 7 1%
Other 28 6%
Unknown 85 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,950,829
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#42,564
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,705
of 90,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#106
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.