The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Chiral quantum optics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature21037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Lodahl, Sahand Mahmoodian, Søren Stobbe, Arno Rauschenbeutel, Philipp Schneeweiss, Jürgen Volz, Hannes Pichler, Peter Zoller |
| Abstract |
Advanced photonic nanostructures are currently revolutionizing the optics and photonics that underpin applications ranging from light technology to quantum-information processing. The strong light confinement in these structures can lock the local polarization of the light to its propagation direction, leading to propagation-direction-dependent emission, scattering and absorption of photons by quantum emitters. The possibility of such a propagation-direction-dependent, or chiral, light-matter interaction is not accounted for in standard quantum optics and its recent discovery brought about the research field of chiral quantum optics. The latter offers fundamentally new functionalities and applications: it enables the assembly of non-reciprocal single-photon devices that can be operated in a quantum superposition of two or more of their operational states and the realization of deterministic spin-photon interfaces. Moreover, engineered directional photonic reservoirs could lead to the development of complex quantum networks that, for example, could simulate novel classes of quantum many-body systems. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 77% |
| Scientists | 8 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 988 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 972 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 282 | 29% |
| Researcher | 164 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 98 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 5% |
| Professor | 53 | 5% |
| Other | 139 | 14% |
| Unknown | 198 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 552 | 56% |
| Engineering | 92 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 46 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 39 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 31 | 3% |
| Unknown | 223 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 210. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#196,586
of 26,379,745 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,661
of 100,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,188
of 428,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#236
of 816 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,379,745 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 816 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.