| Title |
De novo nonsense mutations in ASXL1 cause Bohring-Opitz syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.868 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander Hoischen, Bregje W M van Bon, Benjamín Rodríguez-Santiago, Christian Gilissen, Lisenka E L M Vissers, Petra de Vries, Irene Janssen, Bart van Lier, Rob Hastings, Sarah F Smithson, Ruth Newbury-Ecob, Susanne Kjaergaard, Judith Goodship, Ruth McGowan, Deborah Bartholdi, Anita Rauch, Maarit Peippo, Jan M Cobben, Dagmar Wieczorek, Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach, Joris A Veltman, Han G Brunner, Bert B B A de Vries |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 23% |
| Researcher | 47 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2015.
All research outputs
#3,640,538
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#3,855
of 7,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,083
of 116,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#32
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.