↓ Skip to main content

GTP-dependent twisting of dynamin implicates constriction and tension in membrane fission

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
388 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
Title
GTP-dependent twisting of dynamin implicates constriction and tension in membrane fission
Published in
Nature, April 2006
DOI 10.1038/nature04718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurélien Roux, Katherine Uyhazi, Adam Frost, Pietro De Camilli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Germany 6 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
France 5 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 310 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 30%
Researcher 96 28%
Student > Master 29 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 8%
Student > Bachelor 23 7%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 23 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 187 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 17%
Physics and Astronomy 16 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 3%
Neuroscience 12 3%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 30 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,227,221
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#32,368
of 79,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,935
of 197,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#546
of 713 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 89.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 713 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.