元のNature論文 https://t.co/RRzvBvKXNb と、告発記事 https://t.co/HvKliU2PC8 当該論文はまだ撤回はされていないので、今回の論文でもリファレンスの1番目に引用されているが、疑惑についての言及は特になし。
@holmanm Some people think that this study https://t.co/2cEaJ1ZiqD was not legit and many including MSM https://t.co/aOLhcxpj9B expressing doubts about the whole ‘beta amyloid accumulation causes Alzheimer’s’. So far, drugs aimed at lowering beta amyloid h
@jhmdrei >この論文のいくつかの図に関する懸念について警告を受けています。Natureはこれらの懸念を調査しており、さらなる編集上の対応ができるだけ早く続きます。それまでの間、読者はそこで報告された結果を使用する際に注意することをお勧めします。 https://t.co/YxneLmNwC1
@jhmdrei >この論文のいくつかの図に関する懸念について警告を受けています。Natureはこれらの懸念を調査しており、さらなる編集上の対応ができるだけ早く続きます。それまでの間、読者はそこで報告された結果を使用する際に注意することをお勧めします。 https://t.co/YxneLmNwC1
The original 2006 @Nature study that has since come under scrutiny https://t.co/McQsscZBXM
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
Let’s not forget that scientific data are the independent variables, not the stature of the publishing scientist nor the impact factor of the journal where they’re published.
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
Meredith grey was right 😱
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
16+ years of human cognitive resources, funding and progress affected due to one keystone paper. What a colossal waste of resources and delay in finding treatments. The culture of academia where "novelty" & positive/favourable results are incentivised
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
We really need a course on scientific misconduct @IiserMohali
RT @cpiller: Thread worth reading, re scientific integrity and Alzheimer's disease.
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
As part of being in clinical as well as basic science research, I always check the reliability and reproducibility of my results atleast 5 times. This is a fear I always have. Iff I claim anything ground breaking, the ground should be broken forever &
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
This ia some wild shit 😱 This paper is one of the foundations of the amyloid theory in the disease pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease And it is fabricated???
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @cpiller: I wonder why has Nature not yet retracted the article, many months after its editors posted a notice of concern? Why have the…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @cpiller: I wonder why has Nature not yet retracted the article, many months after its editors posted a notice of concern? Why have the…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @cpiller: I wonder why has Nature not yet retracted the article, many months after its editors posted a notice of concern? Why have the…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @cpiller: I wonder why has Nature not yet retracted the article, many months after its editors posted a notice of concern? Why have the…
RT @cpiller: I wonder why has Nature not yet retracted the article, many months after its editors posted a notice of concern? Why have the…
RT @cpiller: I wonder why has Nature not yet retracted the article, many months after its editors posted a notice of concern? Why have the…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @cpiller: I wonder why has Nature not yet retracted the article, many months after its editors posted a notice of concern? Why have the…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @cpiller: Thread worth reading, re scientific integrity and Alzheimer's disease.
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @cpiller: I wonder why has Nature not yet retracted the article, many months after its editors posted a notice of concern? Why have the…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
RT @schrag_matthew: In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study desc…
Thread worth reading, re scientific integrity and Alzheimer's disease.
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
In Feb 2022, I sent a letter to editors at the journal Nature raising concerns about the integrity of a 2006 study describing the role of β-amyloid oligomers in Alzheimer's disease and a key assembly the authors termed Aβ*56. https://t.co/Mdsp5eeAK5 https:
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @cpiller: I wonder why has Nature not yet retracted the article, many months after its editors posted a notice of concern? Why have the…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: This. There are so many papers with severe concerns - and nothing being done about them. Avoiding retractions is not…
RT @cpiller: I wonder why has Nature not yet retracted the article, many months after its editors posted a notice of concern? Why have the…