↓ Skip to main content

Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
512 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
709 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes
Published in
Nature, October 2001
DOI 10.1038/35099540
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Kleijn, Frank Berendse, Ruben Smit, Niels Gilissen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 709 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 1%
France 8 1%
Germany 5 <1%
Switzerland 5 <1%
United States 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 20 3%
Unknown 646 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 167 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 141 20%
Student > Master 107 15%
Student > Bachelor 69 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 30 4%
Other 115 16%
Unknown 80 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 347 49%
Environmental Science 196 28%
Social Sciences 17 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 1%
Other 27 4%
Unknown 101 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#992,205
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#31,026
of 92,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#655
of 44,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#33
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.