| Title |
Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1038/35041539 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter M. Cox, Richard A. Betts, Chris D. Jones, Steven A. Spall, Ian J. Totterdell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 191 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 8% |
| Canada | 11 | 6% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 87 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 176 | 92% |
| Scientists | 9 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | <1% |
| Brazil | 18 | <1% |
| Germany | 11 | <1% |
| Canada | 8 | <1% |
| France | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 54 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2953 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 668 | 21% |
| Researcher | 522 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 466 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 425 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 129 | 4% |
| Other | 514 | 16% |
| Unknown | 410 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 722 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 646 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 554 | 18% |
| Engineering | 158 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 121 | 4% |
| Other | 414 | 13% |
| Unknown | 519 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 428. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#68,753
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#5,210
of 98,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21
of 41,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#1
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.