@anton_ilitch C est faux l'OmS à déconseillé les confinements et il n'existe aucune étude favorable que des études défavorables dont celle de Nature qui porte sur 87 régions et 57 pays https://t.co/mfQFPqXKwZ
@BalUndy @leijpeideaud @yvonnesmits @telegraaf Een aanname waar vaak op gehamerd wordt.. onterecht https://t.co/ydi9ThHmd4
@Hawky26007514 @blackhecker @LutzvanderHorst Die imaginierten Massengräber. Jaja. Altersbereinigt keine Übersterblichkeit und die Weltbevölkerung ist um 100 Millionen gewachsen. Und das Präventionsparadox: https://t.co/gyJOcb5gyE
@C_A_Gustave @LerouxArthur10 C’est pas cocasse, il y a plusieurs publications scientifiques à ce sujet + la mesure de présence virale dans les eaux usées sans équivoque https://t.co/ahKaDc9f6y https://t.co/P5jZ3wNPV1 https://t.co/EAOwwgTkyq https://t
@Mohamma58954475 @Iranianpoet 6- مطابق مقالهء منتشره در نشریهء نیچر، در 5 مارس 2021 (14 اسفند 99) موندن در خانه، نقشی اصلی در کاهش انتقال کووید19 ندارد. https://t.co/PwrC4MQvap
@PoliticsForAlI This paper generally did not find a correlation in Google Mobility Data vs COVID mortality. Given that keeping people at home causes other harms like reduced physical activity, ending restrictions would seem the heathiest approach. ht
@TheLawyerCraig 2/2 Measures like partial lockdowns or masks do not appear to be well correlated with COVID metrics. For example, here is a controversial paper generally not finding a correlation in Google's mobility tracking data vs COVID mortality.
@Fan2PhysiKantik @bobopopo67 @CgtTuifrance Et il y a aussi l'étude de Nature sur 87 régions, 51 pays, 27 États du Brésil, 6 capitales d'état Brésilien, et 3 grandes villes Tokyo, Berlin et New-York et ça ne marche pas. https://t.co/mfQFPqXKwZ
RT @shekinah1313: "In conclusion, using this methodology & current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the worl…
@mikeymikester @BattleFuzz @pcrritesgood @JordanSchachtel @SenTedCruz Am I writing an academic paper? People have done it for me. There was a stats research made on that and they came to the conclusion that there was no correlation. https://t.co/xJontFTCs6
"In conclusion, using this methodology & current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home." Lockdowns don't work. We knew this beforeh
@TimGlauert @timfarron Over a year old, when the data were sparse and other studies were already reaching different conclusions. On the other hand, there is this from this year: https://t.co/eIm97JcDEb
RT @GraffitiExpert: Finland's Constitutional Law Committee reproaches government for declaring a state of emergency to amend the law -> htt…
@Pinkgelato15 @azardsphere @Elijah_reddoor @BreakfastNews @mjrowland68 @normanswan Yes and people only have one life. Everyone's days are numbered. Who are you or anyone to tell them they can't leave their homes? lf you're scared, stay home. US states sho
RT @the_brumby: 31. https://t.co/Y3X1cqxQRd "After preprocessing the data, 87 regions around the world were included, yielding 3741 pairwi…
@neetegenmsm1 @SimoneSays123 Kansloze prutsers daar bij @NUnl zowel de redactie als bij de lezers. Doe sporadisch nog wel eens een poging wat reaguurders bij @Nuji wat bij te brengen, maar als ze artikelen zoals deze zelfs gaan censureren houdt het wat m
RT @richardursomd: @MintoGraeme Here’s one on lockdowns. https://t.co/5Qw6G0ZLzI
Προς καραντίνολαβερς : A recent mathematical model has suggested that staying at home did not play a dominant role in reducing COVID-19 transmission. https://t.co/L6wmOHWh0k
RT @revoltes: Les confinements n'ont eu aucune utilité (source: Nature). Par contre ces mesures liberticides moyenâgeuses et inutiles ont…
RT @revoltes: Les confinements n'ont eu aucune utilité (source: Nature). Par contre ces mesures liberticides moyenâgeuses et inutiles ont…
RT @revoltes: Les confinements n'ont eu aucune utilité (source: Nature). Par contre ces mesures liberticides moyenâgeuses et inutiles ont…
RT @revoltes: Les confinements n'ont eu aucune utilité (source: Nature). Par contre ces mesures liberticides moyenâgeuses et inutiles ont…
RT @richardursomd: @MintoGraeme Here’s one on lockdowns. https://t.co/5Qw6G0ZLzI
RT @mipardudire: Ayer vimos que estudio + grande sobre el impacto d cuarentenas en la mortalidad mostró su inutilidad: https://t.co/lvcST30…
RT @MollyDivine: This Dr is gold! Visit her page for the honest truth - not fake news. https://t.co/Hzs6CvRNu0
@MintoGraeme Here’s one on lockdowns. https://t.co/5Qw6G0ZLzI
@gabrielzinkkk1 @emb_resistencia @leandroruschel @ALLuSapelli 6 - medidas nunca antes utilizadas (lockdowns de pessoas saudáveis) foram vendidas como "gospel", sem ter QQ lastro mínimo de ciência para a sustentar. E as pesquisas sérias sobre o assunto não
RT @MNHR_Labo: 「ロックダウンや外出自粛はCOVID-19の感染減少に支配的な役割を果たしていない。(中略)世界87の地域を、線形回帰分析で3741のペアワイズ比較をしたところ、約98%の地域で"家にいること"によるCOVID-19の死亡率を低下を説明できなかった…
@rexzane1 For why "unlocked" regions often did better, 1) Google's mobility data generally is not correlated with COVID mortality. 2) Lock downs may decrease physical activity and increase weight: ~30 lbs per capita in US. That may increase net mortality
@gillesDM92 @SGeysenbergh @GevaertThomas Een ander geheimpje. Lockdowns hebben nagenoeg geen invloed gehad. https://t.co/MreBjgTYTl
@AlexHSchwemmer @Hosenmaus1 https://t.co/a678rpI9E2 https://t.co/zbgcQ96cqu https://t.co/UPkAYv2zqD (kontrolliertes Experiment in Dänemark) https://t.co/vt5JYPP2OX https://t.co/HvyOvcBXOP Lesen, dann schreiben!
@sdbaral Thank you for the post. This paper looks for an association between stay-at-home orders and COVID mortality. It compares Google's mobility data with COVID 19 mortality data in regions over weeks 9-34. It did not find a correlation in 98% of reg
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: Lockdown wirksam gegen #Corona? Politik hat keine Fakten https://t.co/Q69mvrnZKS Fakten dagegen! https://t.co/mWw4KgTP…
@ellymelly Must not have seen the memo: Lockdowns: https://t.co/eJwNzmO48W Masking: https://t.co/JlRVWkEpex Vaccine Data: https://t.co/2tGjO1oLYj Or the actual plan prior to the Chinese plan: https://t.co/WMr1rZztDJ Cheers :)
@Noircruzer @AnnastaciaMP Only bogans :) apparently the only ones that can read: Lockdowns: https://t.co/eJwNzmO48W Masking: https://t.co/JlRVWkEpex Vaccine Data: https://t.co/2tGjO1oLYj The government relies on folks like you that don't ask any questio
@david_hilcher @australiafirst3 @AnnastaciaMP Lazy ad hominem. Jesus ... all day long here. Anyone asking questions should definitely be ridiculed: Lockdowns: https://t.co/eJwNzmO48W Masking: https://t.co/JlRVWkEpex Vaccine Data: https://t.co/2tGjO1oLYj
@LensLodulac @LCI @YukiNek56432140 @verif_TF1LCI @felicia_sidx Comme vous ne lisez rien vous passez à côté de ça ! https://t.co/qzymF09rHr https://t.co/djIVgjeFei https://t.co/0kYpvjGXtk https://t.co/3ocDiVsyfm https://t.co/O3I4AeubxT https://t.co/98X334j3
RT @PabloRichly: Como ya sucedió antes https://t.co/MXw5BM1S9c la relación positiva entre quedarse en casa y la reducción de muertes no log…
Como ya sucedió antes https://t.co/MXw5BM1S9c la relación positiva entre quedarse en casa y la reducción de muertes no logra observarse. https://t.co/8XolWBZhJB Una variable aislada a veces no explica inequívocamente fenómenos complejos.
RT @jhnhellstrom: - Fresh publication in Nature - "- In conclusion, using current data, ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different region…
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: This is HUGE https://t.co/9mHI7ViGKZ
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: This is HUGE
RT @jhnhellstrom: - Fresh publication in Nature - "- In conclusion, using current data, ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different region…
RT @jhnhellstrom: - Fresh publication in Nature - "- In conclusion, using current data, ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different region…
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: This is HUGE
RT @jhnhellstrom: - Fresh publication in Nature - "- In conclusion, using current data, ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different region…
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: This is HUGE
Interesting.
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: This is HUGE https://t.co/9mHI7ViGKZ
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: This is HUGE
RT @jhnhellstrom: - Fresh publication in Nature - "- In conclusion, using current data, ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different region…
RT @jhnhellstrom: - Fresh publication in Nature - "- In conclusion, using current data, ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different region…
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: This is HUGE
@ThManfredi @summerofciuccio @gianlucac1 @PoliticaPerEwok @Clutcher @CrossWordsCW Mi rivelo: sono uno che studia. E questi di Nature insistono a dire che non riescono a trovare benefici del LD. Una banda di criminali, giusto? https://t.co/fbr26ejA98
Lockdowns ... https://t.co/eJwNzmO48W ... very comprehensive. Bad news for the proponents.
@deman760 @KUSINews @nathanfletcher No, they did not https://t.co/sWA04q5K32
@brunosansil @Donna_dBrisa Aqui é um estudo que saiu na revista Nature, comparando 87 regiões que tiveram mais restrições, e menos (incluindo o Brasil). E não houve diferenças significativas. https://t.co/j8kEEaRF5K
@sdbaral Thànks you for posting. If viral interference explains why flu disappeared even in places with less distancing or masks, viral interference may also solve another mystery: why COVID stats seem not to be correlated with Google's cell phone tracki
@mkeulemans @hansvantelling Hoeveel papers wil je hebben met het tegendeel? Je koopt tijd, meer niet. Nieuwere papers met nieuwere inzichten. Wetenschap. Feiten. "Stay-at-home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet-based ecological study | Sci
@mkeulemans @hansvantelling Er zal vast wel een klein effect zijn.. Maar je vergeet de nadelige effecten. Een vlam in de plan blus je ook niet met een blusvliegtuig. Ja je brandje is uit, maar je huis is ook onherstelbaar beschadigd. https://t.co/15P0Wp9
@f_philippot Ne pourrions nous pas enfin soigner les personnes atteintes du Covid ? D'autant plus qu'une nouvelle étude publié dans "Nature" détruit le récit de l'utilité du confinement https://t.co/0SmolEr1Hr https://t.co/jamnfGll90
@BBCPolitics Good. Fair to ask if lockdowns reduced mortality? (https://t.co/tg6oHudv0S) What impact outlawing behaviours had above voluntary behaviours? (https://t.co/oepWiIvWw2) Did lockdowns lead to larger future outbreaks (https://t.co/faKnBKQiOn)? Do
RT @gustinicchi: Nature, i LOCK-DOWN sono inutili. https://t.co/qYRTv1Ttvo
RT @gustinicchi: Nature, i LOCK-DOWN sono inutili. https://t.co/qYRTv1Ttvo
RT @gustinicchi: Nature, i LOCK-DOWN sono inutili. https://t.co/qYRTv1Ttvo
RT @gustinicchi: Nature, i LOCK-DOWN sono inutili. https://t.co/qYRTv1Ttvo
RT @gustinicchi: Nature, i LOCK-DOWN sono inutili. https://t.co/qYRTv1Ttvo
RT @gustinicchi: Nature, i LOCK-DOWN sono inutili. https://t.co/qYRTv1Ttvo
RT @gustinicchi: Nature, i LOCK-DOWN sono inutili. https://t.co/qYRTv1Ttvo
RT @gustinicchi: Nature, i LOCK-DOWN sono inutili. https://t.co/qYRTv1Ttvo
@rubenivangaalen @Jpaarhuis Ja, zowel 45+ als 65+ verschillen ook eerder 15-20× dan 60×.. Benieuwd dus of geografische verschillen als bevolkingsdichtheid (& windkracht?) dit verschil van factor ~3 ondanks gedrag (!) beter verklaren. Ps. In Nature bl
@RogerGustafsso2 @Elisabethis @mr_engstrom @mask_up_sweden Silly. The notion that strict lockdowns reduce established COVID-19 to minimal levels is refuted by science as countries retaining persistently high rates despite prolonged lockdowns and by the exp
@Paladiumcrayon @caitoz https://t.co/zAN3iiCyCV Sorry. Thought I already had.
@Pablo_Riol @JoseLui05252985 @PabloFuente @covid_london Por supuesto que no... https://t.co/smtoINBWtD
@Nature I was wondering if there was any editorial response concerning the article https://t.co/EzRh0r5IN7
@camilocammas @GmoRamirez @jalessandri @Cami_FloresO @dipuBobadilla @ivanmoreirab @UrrutiaporChile @diputadosudi @vtroncosoh @Tono_Coloma @leoromerosaez Ver la realidad, otros paises, no el pánico irracional del gobierno! Cuarentena no reduce mortalidad ht
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: Corona-Pandemie: Forscher zweifeln an Effekt von Lockdown und „Notbremse“ https://t.co/GxPW5MeVrE Hier weitere Studien…
@OmarAzizSenador Quem é o negacionista? A comunidade científica tem mais de 30 estudos confirmando ineficiência do Lockdown. https://t.co/hsbXsZXLHp
@CNNBrasil Ele afirma? São mais de 30 estudos afirmando que realmente não funciona. https://t.co/hsbXsZXLHp
@Gh3ttoAstronaut @KBlackbirdlaw @jackhog98141102 @Dierenbach @nick_the_geek78 You’re speaking for what’s happening in BC, not Canada. Maybe you should step out of your bubble & take a look what’s happening to other people in the country, especially whe