Stay-at-home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet-based ecological study User Best-Drive-7695, in the Reddit Science subreddit, 23 Mar 2021
Stay-at-home policy is a case of exception fallacy User CKsTechnologyNews, in the CK's Technology News provides Tech, Security & Privacy related News. subreddit, 14 Mar 2021
From 'Nature' publishing: "With our results, we were not able to explain if COVID-19 mortality is reduced by staying at home in ~ 98% of the comparisons after epidemiological weeks 9 to 34" User Nergaal, in the Conservative subreddit, 10 Mar 2021
Artigo científico publicado na revista Nature não encontrou evidências de eficácia do "fique em casa" contra covid19 User Ancapitu, in the Brasil Livre subreddit, 09 Mar 2021
In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home. User DettetheAssette, 09 Mar 2021
Stay-at-home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet-based ecological study User FinFreedomCountdown, in the COVID-19 subreddit, 08 Mar 2021
Stay-at-home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet-based ecological study User Tophattingson, in the UK Anti-Lockdown subreddit, 08 Mar 2021
[Nature] Stay-at-home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet-based ecological study User Gracchusthe4th, in the CoronavirusUK subreddit, 07 Mar 2021
"In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home." User grasssstastesbada, in the LockdownSkepticismCAN subreddit, 07 Mar 2021
New article in Nature: “In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home.” User clme, in the Free-thinkers resisting the New Normal subreddit, 07 Mar 2021
New article in Nature: “In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home.” User clme, in the COVID subreddit, 07 Mar 2021
New article in Nature: “In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home.” User clme, in the Coronavirus Ontario subreddit, 07 Mar 2021
New article in Nature: “In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home.” User clme, in the Coronto Virus toronto subreddit, 07 Mar 2021
Stay-at-home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet-based ecological study User InspectorPraline, in the LockdownSkepticism subreddit, 07 Mar 2021
New article in Nature: “In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home.” User thinkinanddrinkin, in the Lockdown Critical Left subreddit, 07 Mar 2021