@Dr_logicaI @jsm2334 @partisanregret Dr. Male is quoted elsewhere in the thread, she summarized the available data four months after these vaccines became available. https://t.co/0aCGYMKSLE
@MauritzPreller Vikki Male addressed this quite easily. It's reference 102 or 103 from the above: https://t.co/g32wQXsFve https://t.co/1rNVM0QFzz
@paulbee82849197 @TruthHurts2160 @CJ_Feher @Sharky_vs_Evil Sorry PR you're caught in cross posting with TH re: D-Dimers The safety in pregnancy was initially studied through accidental pregnancies in the first trials the paper below is a good summary from
@camajor54 @dm_ms @eyepodster @mpc_xetts @IanCopeland5 I've already addressed this, again here's what was known in early 2021. There's also a NEJM article if you would like me to put it into the thread. https://t.co/oTR4U8HceK
@camajor54 @dm_ms @eyepodster @mpc_xetts @IanCopeland5 Here's a review of the early evidence from 2021. https://t.co/0aCGYMKSLE
THEY TRY TO EXPLAIN IT AWAY BOTH SIDE ALWAYS https://t.co/DljwKhEwQh
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @GiddyupMindless For example, here’s me commenting on it early in 2021. (Table above different from the one published…
@WarFigs @thevivafrei @Debunk_the_Funk Sure. No problem. https://t.co/Oyoh55qKK2
@abigail_fekete @drquinngyn @aussielovesyou Not exactly.... https://t.co/84UnCsYibA
@Antss1986 @ovierocks1 @RWMaloneMD If you don’t like the lancet, here’s a review with multiple studies showing no increase in pregnancy issues, miscarriages and better health in the vaccinated mothers. Multiple journals for you to pick from https://t.co/
@fritsander @HarperL75661966 @ichudov We had reassuring safety data from the clinical trials, spontaneous reporting and a formal observational study of almost 4k people. It was the latter that finally convinced us that mRNA COVID vaccines were safe to offe
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @Sharky_vs_Evil @MrXLovesUs @CartlandDavid @ztkelly I can’t see anymore of course, but I’m pretty sure that the Rumble v…
@Sharky_vs_Evil @MrXLovesUs @CartlandDavid @ztkelly I can’t see anymore of course, but I’m pretty sure that the Rumble video was what I was responding to here. At this point the real question is… can anyone actually play pool at that table?
@JohnKohler3 @SarahLawtonRN @DeaconGlover1 @richardursomd I am... and one who has read and written about pregnancies in the trials to boot. The miscarriage rate in the vaccinated and the control groups for both Pfizer and Moderna trials were the same - and
@lidamonroe7 @DrAseemMalhotra Read the research from Victoria Male and if there’s proved vaccine injury that must be awful , however the relationship to vaccine might be coincidental , events at birth or pregnancy do happen anyway . https://t.co/AMIX9Quogt
@D_Gen_R8_ @CartlandDavid The link to the trial data is in the tweet. https://t.co/0x4CG1WP8U
RT @CartlandDavid: I apologise Viki did respond I missed it she does confirm that we were using women as lab rats with ‘limited’ data. I wo…
RT @CartlandDavid: I apologise Viki did respond I missed it she does confirm that we were using women as lab rats with ‘limited’ data. I wo…
RT @CartlandDavid: Thank God Viki we had safety data from 57 women before it was rolled out on the pregnant public! Indefensible
RT @CartlandDavid: Thank God Viki we had safety data from 57 women before it was rolled out on the pregnant public! Indefensible
And what was the outcome of those pregnancies? And the long term data for these babies shows what exactly?? Theres's a special place waiting for these people.
RT @CartlandDavid: I apologise Viki did respond I missed it she does confirm that we were using women as lab rats with ‘limited’ data. I wo…
RT @CartlandDavid: I apologise Viki did respond I missed it she does confirm that we were using women as lab rats with ‘limited’ data. I wo…
RT @CartlandDavid: Thank God Viki we had safety data from 57 women before it was rolled out on the pregnant public! Indefensible
RT @CartlandDavid: Thank God Viki we had safety data from 57 women before it was rolled out on the pregnant public! Indefensible
Thank God Viki we had safety data from 57 women before it was rolled out on the pregnant public! Indefensible
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @CartlandDavid @ztkelly The answer to this is the same as last time you asked me. The pregnancy safety data from the cli…
I apologise Viki did respond I missed it she does confirm that we were using women as lab rats with ‘limited’ data. I would like to see this limited data @VikiLovesFACS as to my knowledge pregnant women were excluded from trials and pregnancy discouraged!
@Angela36596014 @VikiLovesFACS @CartlandDavid I believe that this IS an Answer. Anyone who thinks that it isn't, are those who do not like the TRUE Narrative. https://t.co/EopwhrI2l7
@CartlandDavid Here is an article from March 2021 https://t.co/2MvhAvHX5n
@MsAmitripped @GEdwards2021 @JRobertJohnson4 @stkirsch Why post this then? What was the purpose? https://t.co/BmT4Peuo0k
@michellespj @EveInOz @misstynite @kjheatherIng @stkirsch At least I can admit stuff I'm clueless about and asked for a friend to step in. What's wrong with that? Is this a fight because of your vendetta or is this info you want to know? I sent this. The
@michellespj @misstynite @kjheatherIng @stkirsch @EveInOz And also, Incase you didn't see these. https://t.co/iPmec16sJ7
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @CartlandDavid @ztkelly The answer to this is the same as last time you asked me. The pregnancy safety data from the cli…
@trumps25508904 @ztkelly @CartlandDavid @mbrrace There were 57 pregnancies in the clinical trials. The link to that data is in my response to David, but here it is again... https://t.co/0x4CG1WP8U
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @CartlandDavid @ztkelly The answer to this is the same as last time you asked me. The pregnancy safety data from the cli…
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @CartlandDavid @ztkelly The answer to this is the same as last time you asked me. The pregnancy safety data from the cli…
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @CartlandDavid @ztkelly The answer to this is the same as last time you asked me. The pregnancy safety data from the cli…
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @CartlandDavid @ztkelly The answer to this is the same as last time you asked me. The pregnancy safety data from the cli…
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @CartlandDavid @ztkelly The answer to this is the same as last time you asked me. The pregnancy safety data from the cli…
@CartlandDavid @ztkelly The answer to this is the same as last time you asked me. The pregnancy safety data from the clinical trials was limited but I wouldn’t describe it as “not a single piece”.
@thelittlegirl22 @ClaudeSteve6 @StefR78 également sûr chez les femmes enceintes. Donc ça me parait plutôt logique de l'avoir recommandé ensuite non ? https://t.co/d4WsUXhEar https://t.co/eC4Hh2drVZ
@Casey151170 @SocksPoker @DrAseemMalhotra @RetsefL Here is my summary of the data that was available at that time, from Nature Reviews Immunology. https://t.co/0x4CG1WP8U
@CB75320487 @CKellyUAP Before the rollout we had quite limited data from the clinical trials. It was reassuring, but there wasn’t a lot of it. Here’s more info… 1/ https://t.co/0x4CG1WP8U
@CarlaPeeters3 Onzin. Het idee ontstond toen duidelijk werd dat een COVID infectie bij zwangeren gecorreleerd met problemen. Zie de OR's!!! https://t.co/5pROh8uZTK Er waren toen al aanwijzingen dat vaccines voldoende veilig waren voor zwangeren. https
@CartlandDavid The answer is the same as last time you asked.
RT @FanCooler2: Marzo 21 https://t.co/l8An6l7HzG
RT @FanCooler2: Marzo 21 https://t.co/l8An6l7HzG
Marzo 21 https://t.co/l8An6l7HzG
@CartlandDavid Hi David. The safety data we had in December 2020 was limited, but you can find what we knew in my Nature Review, published a few months later. 1/ https://t.co/0x4CG1WP8U
@MarcusCRF300 @ramiliesaho @SarahCaul_ONS @Jikkyleaks @JikkyIeaks Yes, that is the official statement from the NCIRS and is in line with an entire body of research that shows that they are safe for pregnant women and Covid is dangerous to both pregnant mot
RT @Jikkyleaks: @MarchandSurgery @VikiLovesFACS @pseudonodus @drdrew @YouTube Worse, Greg. At the time of the first review that was touted…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @MarchandSurgery @VikiLovesFACS @pseudonodus @drdrew @YouTube Worse, Greg. At the time of the first review that was touted…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @MarchandSurgery @VikiLovesFACS @pseudonodus @drdrew @YouTube Worse, Greg. At the time of the first review that was touted…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @MarchandSurgery @VikiLovesFACS @pseudonodus @drdrew @YouTube Worse, Greg. At the time of the first review that was touted…
@MarchandSurgery @VikiLovesFACS @pseudonodus @drdrew @YouTube Worse, Greg. At the time of the first review that was touted as showing that the vaccines were safe in pregnancy (they were never shown to be using adequate criteria) Viki had no background in c
@JaviCarrascoMun @Farmaenfurecida Pero si eres tú el que quiere demostrar lo contrario, yo te dejo aquí un estudio sobre el riesgo de las vacunas en embarazadas que dice lo contrario publicado en nature https://t.co/RnlVCKT30A
@turdeaudonkey @Blame_me66 @Jikkyleaks @VikiLovesFACS @P_McCulloughMD @Fynnderella1 @DrKellyVictory @btysonmd Great response, obviously clicking through a few tweets is too much for you so I’ll spoon feed you.
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @Jacquifrench27 @dr_cartland In the first trials, pregnancy was an exclusion criterion but nonetheless some participants…
@Jacquifrench27 @dr_cartland In the first trials, pregnancy was an exclusion criterion but nonetheless some participants became pregnant by accident, and we collected some safety data from them. Here’s what we knew about that in the first months of 2021… 3
@theyareus2 @DamienBrunton @jimmy_dore @tanyalewis314 @sciam That’s from January 2021. There was very little information then (though not none - see my article on this published at that time). Unsurprisingly the advice has been updated in the intervening t
@theyareus2 @DamienBrunton @jimmy_dore @tanyalewis314 @sciam That’s from January 2021. There was very little information then (though not none - see my article on this published at that time). Unsurprisingly the advice has been updated in the intervening t
@DawgAlfie @angelovalidiya @hotentot33 @juneslater17 Exactly how you suggest. You inform the patients of what data exists (and in fact there was some. See my paper on this from early 2021) and then they can either consent or not, as they choose. https://
@michaelbombard @josephkrengel @SteveDishMonkey @KashPrime This says it's very safe in pregnancy. https://t.co/Oyoh55rizA
@MartinLipman6 @gmacofglebe weighing risk reward is the message I see here from April 2021 https://t.co/PBKpHOWoWR and there were articles that could help decisions here: https://t.co/VwtfZ31zBl here: https://t.co/3HMyuqy0KR here: https://t.co/uWMh4DaLr8
No obstante, se ha encontrado que la proporción de embarazos entre mujeres vacunadas y no vacunadas es bastante similar, por lo que se deduce que las vacunas no tendrían ningún efecto negativo sobre la probabilidad de conseguir el embarazo. https://t.co/C
RT @lonnibesancon: En effet, dans les études princeps sur la vaccination, on a observé le même taux de grossesses (involontaire, c'est à di…
En effet, dans les études princeps sur la vaccination, on a observé le même taux de grossesses (involontaire, c'est à dire qu'il a été dit aux patients d'éviter de tomber enceintes) chez les groupes vaccinés et groupe controle. 12/n https://t.co/9DDn0mnXe
@1Voice_Mines You can find a lot of the same information in my two Nature Reviews Immunology pieces, here… 1/ https://t.co/0x4CG1WP8U
@__hugh_jass__ @JohnCornfield6 @colossusPhD The studies trickled out prior, but there were several smaller ones: ie https://t.co/7gNt8veauJ https://t.co/3HMyuqy0KR https://t.co/az3vbCcM85 and they would follow CDC recommendations: https://t.co/nCfUFV8266
@BeatrizTalegon @Diario_16 Aqui se le olvida citar los estudios que se han hecho en mujeres embarazadas 1-https://t.co/yO8yGrJJXo 2-https://t.co/W8cK6qbRZJ 3-https://t.co/6IYYWW4zAC https://t.co/o41peeXVrO
Or, de toute évidence, Viki Male a : - reçu un laissez-passer pour publier un article d'opinion dans la revue "Nature". En effet, c'est réservé aux universitaires établis tandis que son expérience de recherche est assez faible. - des liens avec la 77e. htt
https://t.co/h57gJfqFrx... 2003 2005 @MPF_PGR @JusticeOIG @FBIPhoenix ... @mpsp_oficial @US_FDA ... (@fema), conseguiu o cardiologista e o Ex Secretario OMS francês ? @ABRASCO @comunicacns ? (@corensaopaulo) @mqueiroga2 ...
RT @Tzarichyiun: @GUstaoset @profnfenton They did come up with an, albeit questionable, study though before advising, didn't they? There we…
RT @DrKatEpi: 9/The rate of pregnancies in the Pfizer trial (presumably unintended as participants were asked not to get pregnant during th…
@louhun0703 @RCObsGyn @MidwivesRCM This is old but explains how data was collected during trials. There is a vast amount of data now. What others do is not your concern so keep your nonsense to yourself. https://t.co/cDoiywZqYd
In case anyone is unaware, @VikiLovesFACS published a paper on safety of the jab in pregnancy👇Look at the refs at the bottom and check where she sourced info. eg. MHRA, FDA. The Welcome Trust is Trustee of the BMGF. Conflict of interest, huh? RT pls✌️ http
RT @whykeepitup: Love it when this happens! Random crypto guy accuses Lecturer in Reproductive Immunology of not researching on her special…
@GUstaoset @profnfenton They did come up with an, albeit questionable, study though before advising, didn't they? There were the accidental pregnancies in the trials, for example https://t.co/ZQ7H6mVXdI
Love it when this happens! Random crypto guy accuses Lecturer in Reproductive Immunology of not researching on her specialist subject.
RT @VikiLovesFACS: @TeesOnLine 53 was the number as of December 2020. You can find that here... 1/ https://t.co/0x4CG1WP8U
@TeesOnLine 53 was the number as of December 2020. You can find that here... 1/ https://t.co/0x4CG1WP8U
@Fenku14 @_AgainstMyWill @Carolin42920213 @mattletiss7 If you would like to see the rates before crossover, they're here. And there's also no difference in rates between the groups (or from normal). https://t.co/0x4CG1WP8U
@CryptoTimoon I did. Back in December of 2020 when this data was first made publicly available. And then I wrote an academic article about it. https://t.co/0x4CG1WP8U
@DavidLevan15 @sophielouisecc Plus https://t.co/OBYUpBGoIy this confirms that there is no data on placental transfer or in breast milk
@ztkelly @EmmaLouMarsha11 @hicksyalex @MHRAgovuk @mbrrace @NHSuk @NPEU_UKOSS @RCObsGyn You may find this useful. Despite your claim that the vaccine can never cross the placenta there is no science to back that claim yet. https://t.co/OBYUpBGoIy
RT @DrKatEpi: 9/The rate of pregnancies in the Pfizer trial (presumably unintended as participants were asked not to get pregnant during th…
RT @DrKatEpi: 9/The rate of pregnancies in the Pfizer trial (presumably unintended as participants were asked not to get pregnant during th…
RT @DrKatEpi: 9/The rate of pregnancies in the Pfizer trial (presumably unintended as participants were asked not to get pregnant during th…
RT @DrKatEpi: 9/The rate of pregnancies in the Pfizer trial (presumably unintended as participants were asked not to get pregnant during th…
RT @DrKatEpi: 9/The rate of pregnancies in the Pfizer trial (presumably unintended as participants were asked not to get pregnant during th…