The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||45||54%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||4%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||14||26%|
|Student > Bachelor||6||11%|
|Student > Master||6||11%|
|Student > Postgraduate||4||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||9||17%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 425,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 162.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.