| Title |
The Angelina Jolie effect: Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy trends in patients at increased risk of breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-82654-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Narendra Nath Basu, James Hodson, Shaunak Chatterjee, Ashu Gandhi, Julie Wisely, James Harvey, Lyndsey Highton, John Murphy, Nicola Barnes, Richard Johnson, Lester Barr, Cliona C. Kirwan, Sacha Howell, Andrew D. Baildam, Anthony Howell, D. Gareth Evans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 26% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 85% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#667,855
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,273
of 142,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,505
of 537,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#265
of 4,617 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,617 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.