↓ Skip to main content

Impact of COVID-19 on in vivo work and patient sample availability for cancer research

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cancer, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Impact of COVID-19 on in vivo work and patient sample availability for cancer research
Published in
Nature Reviews Cancer, January 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41568-021-00333-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eoghan J. Mulholland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 33%
Other 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Librarian 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,810,958
of 17,863,100 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#652
of 2,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,090
of 341,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,863,100 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.