↓ Skip to main content

Robotic whiskers used to sense features

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Robotic whiskers used to sense features
Published in
Nature, October 2006
DOI 10.1038/443525a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph H. Solomon, Mitra J. Hartmann

Abstract

Whiskers mimicking those of seals or rats might be useful for underwater tracking or tactile exploration. Several species of terrestrial and marine mammals with whiskers (vibrissae) use them to sense and navigate in their environment--for example, rats use their whiskers to discern the features of objects, and seals rely on theirs to track the hydrodynamic trails of their prey. Here we show that the bending moment--sometimes referred to as torque--at the whisker base can be used to generate three-dimensional spatial representations of the environment, and we use this principle to construct robotic whisker arrays that extract precise information about object shape and fluid flow. Our results will contribute to the development of versatile tactile-sensing systems for robotic applications, and demonstrate the value of hardware models in understanding how sensing mechanisms and movement control strategies are interlocked.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
France 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 123 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Professor 16 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 38 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 25%
Neuroscience 16 12%
Computer Science 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,316,001
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#87,655
of 90,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,008
of 67,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#488
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.