| Title |
Adding a toe joint to a prosthesis: walking biomechanics, energetics, and preference of individuals with unilateral below-knee limb loss
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-81565-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirsty A. McDonald, Rachel H. Teater, Justin P. Cruz, John T. Kerr, Gerasimos Bastas, Karl E. Zelik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Gibraltar | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 53% |
| Scientists | 25 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 18 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#996,076
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#10,308
of 140,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,845
of 516,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#381
of 4,590 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,590 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.