| Title |
Sex bias of females in survival from cancer and infections. Is X the answer?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41416-020-01245-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdullah Al Emran, Stuart J. Gallagher, Jessamy C. Tiffen, Peter Hersey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 29% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,390,458
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#4,512
of 10,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,613
of 503,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#37
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.