| Title |
Artificial intelligence for disparities in knee pain assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-020-01196-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Said A. Ibrahim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 34% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 68% |
| Scientists | 6 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#567,961
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,704
of 8,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,964
of 507,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#55
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.