| Title |
Comparing microfluidics and ultrasonication as formulation methods for developing hempseed oil nanoemulsions for oral delivery applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-79161-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Farahnaz Fathordoobady, Natalia Sannikova, Yigong Guo, Anika Singh, David D. Kitts, Anubhav Pratap-Singh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Sweden | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,642,507
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#52,184
of 125,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,614
of 502,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,916
of 4,422 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,422 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.