↓ Skip to main content

Pretreatment brain volumes can affect the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Pretreatment brain volumes can affect the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients
Published in
Scientific Reports, December 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-79138-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Younghee Yim, Sang Joon Kim, Seung Chai Jung, Ho Sung Kim, Choong Gon Choi, Jung Kyo Lee, Chong Sik Lee, Seung Hyun Lee, Woo Hyun Shim, E.-N. Cheong, Seong-Cheol Park

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Psychology 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 15 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,017,209
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#25,911
of 125,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,949
of 506,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#958
of 4,435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.