| Title |
Diagnostic accuracy systematic review of rectal bleeding in combination with other symptoms, signs and tests in relation to colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605426 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Olde Bekkink, C McCowan, G A Falk, C Teljeur, F A Van de Laar, T Fahey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 36 | 31% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2018.
All research outputs
#847,040
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#282
of 10,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,141
of 165,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#3
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.