| Title |
Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms12151 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maggie R. Wagner, Derek S Lundberg, Tijana G. del Rio, Susannah G. Tringe, Jeffery L. Dangl, Thomas Mitchell-Olds |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 28% |
| Germany | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 55% |
| Scientists | 27 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 852 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 840 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 205 | 24% |
| Researcher | 140 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 113 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 61 | 7% |
| Other | 114 | 13% |
| Unknown | 153 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 450 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 96 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 64 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 45 | 5% |
| Unknown | 172 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#416,767
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6,815
of 58,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,221
of 371,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#141
of 825 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 825 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.