@JuhaMatKatajaju @MTKry @MTKUusimaa Saksassa laskettiin, että lihan tuottajahinnan pitäisi olla jopa 146 % korkeampi, jos tuotannon ilmastovaikutukset huomioitaisiin hinnassa. Mikähän olisi tilanne meillä? https://t.co/EnrnOLPPk9
RT @JulioBasulto_DN: La producción de carne orgánica sigue siendo perjudicial para el medio ambiente. -Noticia👉 https://t.co/2FLW8Qjhzs (@d…
RT @JulioBasulto_DN: La producción de carne orgánica sigue siendo perjudicial para el medio ambiente. -Noticia👉 https://t.co/2FLW8Qjhzs (@d…
RT @JulioBasulto_DN: La producción de carne orgánica sigue siendo perjudicial para el medio ambiente. -Noticia👉 https://t.co/2FLW8Qjhzs (@d…
La producción de carne orgánica sigue siendo perjudicial para el medio ambiente. -Noticia👉 https://t.co/2FLW8Qjhzs (@dpcarrington en @guardian). -Investigación👉 https://t.co/vEEg6JRYpQ (Maximilian Pieper et al. Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 15;11(1):6117). #MásVege
@LauraBromet @leftwingcyclist Zorgen dat er wordt betaalt voor de verborgen milieukosten ("externalities") met behulp van "true pricing" en dat soort dingen. Vervuiler betaalt, weet je wel. Hier een recente publicatie in het toonaangevende tijdschrift Natu
@FlemmingMoller @SlothKristian @vegetariskDVF Her nyt tysk studie, der har forsøgt at udregne klimaomkostningerne fra den tyske produktion. Det finder også, at der stort set ingen forskel er på de to produktioner - selv når man medregner arealanvendelsen i
@Morepiesthanwa1 @DonnachadhMc @guardianeco Just to reflect their climate impacts (& not all other impacts: biodiversity/land use, air pollution, water pollution and eutrophication, water use, antibiotic resistance, risk of pandemics, etc), dairy produ
@ThomasTageH @SimonVGPT @spisekammeret Vha. prissætningen. Nyligt studie viste, at priserne på kød og mælk er kunstigt lave, fordi man ikke medregner klimaomkostningerne forbundet med produktionen. Læg dertil miljøomkostningerne, og priserne vil stige endn
@OkieStotts That's just false. I've already cited one source but here's another: "https://t.co/1cR1VRwfYF". An excerpt follows in the next tweet (edited for length):
Hyvä tiivistelmä ja kuva ajatuksesta ruoan hintaan ilmastovaikutus-lisä #ilmastoruoka
Super, danke Euch für die Infos @AmelieMichalke @jacunku ! Schau ich mir an:)
RT @TSostenibile: Per una ricerca pubblicata su Nature l’attuale prezzo medio di acquisto della carne, e dei prodotti alimentari in genere,…
Per una ricerca pubblicata su Nature l’attuale prezzo medio di acquisto della carne, e dei prodotti alimentari in genere, non riflette il costo in “termini reali” pagato dal consumatore e dalla collettività. ▶️https://t.co/NrPDiIZBhN #toscanasostenibile #
@Steffen_AM @jorn_andersen @jonasholmdk Dyrere? Altså lige nu er maden kunstigt billig fordi man slipper for at betale for eksternaliteterne. Så regningen ender hos os ad andre veje. https://t.co/mbpD4z7wCQ
Organic meats found to have approximately the same greenhouse impact as regular meats https://t.co/iRPsBRVRy4 https://t.co/heeXASFfwn https://t.co/bJqpm8d4ME
RT @ProVeg_Int: Meat may be cheap now, but how much will it cost society in the long-term? New research finds that the price we pay for ani…
RT @ProVeg_Int: Meat may be cheap now, but how much will it cost society in the long-term? New research finds that the price we pay for ani…
Meat may be cheap now, but how much will it cost society in the long-term? New research finds that the price we pay for animal products in the supermarket is too low given their negative impact on the climate. Learn more on the #TrueCosts ➡️ https://t.co/h
@DidrikSoderlind @Klanderverdig @JanNordstr Det er ikke tvil om at plantebasert kosthold er best for planeten og bør økes i andel – i Norge og på verdensbasis! https://t.co/7KKApTHMm1
Det er ikke tvil om at plantebasert kosthold er best for planeten og bør økes i andel – i Norge og på verdensbasis! https://t.co/7KKApTHMm1
@integrationdojo @BeyondMeat @CarnivoreMD @SBakerMD @KenDBerryMD Or maybe for climate change? https://t.co/XHjnDeiwMV
@martonim6p Je n'ai pas eu le temps de tout lire. Mais j'ai trouvé une étude qui compare conv. vs bio. pour le cas allemand. https://t.co/indOTws50M (tableau 1). De ce que j'en comprends, sans tenir compte du CAS en agriculture conventionnelle, le bio fait
@AliaGvR Thank you. https://t.co/9TlVsgjkHV
RT @FEdA_Biodiv: In den Preisen für tierische Lebensmittel fehlen die Kosten der Klima- und Umweltschäden, die bei der Produktion entstehen…
In den Preisen für tierische Lebensmittel fehlen die Kosten der Klima- und Umweltschäden, die bei der Produktion entstehen. Über ein Paper in @NatureComms u.a. von @AmelieMichalke vom FEdA-Projekt HoMaBiLe (https://t.co/HCsrhLNxZf) berichtet der @Guardian:
RT @thegreench1: Primo #climateRant (o #PipponeClimatico). Siete pronti? Articolo su una rivista di Nature sul costo del cibo in termini…
Primo #climateRant (o #PipponeClimatico). Siete pronti? Articolo su una rivista di Nature sul costo del cibo in termini di emissioni. Via. #ClimateAction @fffitalia #climate #ClimateTwitter #ClimateEmergency
Read Table's summary of the paper here: https://t.co/mcFvpGXMBs Find the original paper here: https://t.co/ob8Nx4UqR8 Subscribe to Table's newsletter here: https://t.co/GTe3klJK3d
@PierTavernier @PeyraudJean @GeWoessner Oui, les idéologies sont partout. Pas de pbme avec l'elevage intensif moins polluant parfois. Cf Agribalyse Concernant l'impact environnemental alimentaire, c'est la reduction de conso de viande qui fait la différ
RT @kilnerevonnet: @blogsostenible Ese era el artículo al que se referían desde el artículo de The Guardian. https://t.co/6H2nZKXypm
ET LE COUT DU GIGOT DE CHEVREUIL SAUVAGE??? Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products https://t.co/ofzicj3Daa
@blogsostenible Ese era el artículo al que se referían desde el artículo de The Guardian. https://t.co/6H2nZKXypm
@Schneimere @coop_ch @GrueneParlament @sbv @Suisseporcs Fleisch hat teurer zu werden, nicht günstiger. Dies gilt auch für Label, die dem Kunden mehr Tierwohl vorgaukeln. Das Tier und die Umwelt leiden schlussendlich gleich fest. Höherer Preis = weniger Nac
@chasseurdedahut @EmmanuelMacron @AgriSkippy @agri_zoom c'est une étude qui explique assez bien comment améliorer notre émission de gaz carbonique sans élevage d'animaux. et une autre avec les calcules du coût climatique de la nourriture: https://t.co/2U
RT @VeganeTF: Si on ne tient compte que les émissions de #GES le prix de notre #alimentation végétale devrait être accru de 0,02 € tandis q…
RT @VeganeTF: Si on ne tient compte que les émissions de #GES le prix de notre #alimentation végétale devrait être accru de 0,02 € tandis q…
RT @VeganeTF: Si on ne tient compte que les émissions de #GES le prix de notre #alimentation végétale devrait être accru de 0,02 € tandis q…
Le vrai "prix" de l'#élevage.. Et on ne compte pas les #animaux sacrifiés.. 😥 qui eux paient cher la note ...
Si on ne tient compte que les émissions de #GES le prix de notre #alimentation végétale devrait être accru de 0,02 € tandis que celui de la #viande devrait augmenter de 2,41 €. Ajoutons, le prix des autres pollution, des conditions de travails... https:
“The approach- even with partial implementation- could lead to an increase in the welfare of society as a whole by reducing current market imperfections and their resulting negative ecological and social impacts.” #ClimateAdaptation https://t.co/AmZtjzpQW
Este es el estudio original que muestra que el daño ambiental de los productos animales es superior al de los vegetales. Además, el impacto de la carne "tradicional" y la ecológica es prácticamente igual. Urgen a aplicar impuestos sobre estos productos. h
RT @NatureComms: Food production is a major source of greenhouse gases. These authors show that emissions do more than just amplify climate…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @whittledaway: Is this what farming reps mean when they say they want people to pay more for food? Doubling the price of beef only cov…
RT @Plant_proof: And organic animal products have a similar GHG footprint to conventional https://t.co/71CfKzlvbF
RT @Plant_proof: And organic animal products have a similar GHG footprint to conventional https://t.co/71CfKzlvbF
RT @Plant_proof: And organic animal products have a similar GHG footprint to conventional https://t.co/71CfKzlvbF
And organic animal products have a similar GHG footprint to conventional https://t.co/71CfKzlvbF
@TU_Muenchen Die Studie (Englisch) gibts hier: https://t.co/OBkQ9eD2je
RT @gruntvegan: New study published in scientific journal #Nature, found that even the greenest, organic, grass-fed meat - animal flesh - p…
RT @gruntvegan: New study published in scientific journal #Nature, found that even the greenest, organic, grass-fed meat - animal flesh - p…
New study published in scientific journal #Nature, found that even the greenest, organic, grass-fed meat - animal flesh - products are still worse for the #climate than the worst vegan options. https://t.co/Cvau2MnofS
@BValiorgue @Fabiensapiens @Janus_ZoneGrise Vous avez fait un lien entre la publication d'un chercheur dans Nature, et un recrutement à son université sur l'agriculture cellulaire. Doit-on maintenant s'assurer des recrutements de son université pour évit
Very interesting thread.
@BethanStagg @PeligrosoFitz @whittledaway And recent call by health professionals to tax foods (meat and dairy) because of their health costs as well (previous study was about climate 'externalities' only): https://t.co/Q96i0ReHtg
@BethanStagg @PeligrosoFitz @whittledaway The true costs of foods are not taken into consideration. Recent study: https://t.co/Q96i0ReHtg https://t.co/OUSNntqUV1
As if by magic a new study has appeared on organic meat and climate ... it costs the externalities ... gets 2.41 Euro/Kg for organic (and conventionial) animal foods (meat) compared to 0.02 Euro/kg for plant foods. https://t.co/ZUI4eAP1Bj https://t.co/bS
RT @whittledaway: Is this what farming reps mean when they say they want people to pay more for food? Doubling the price of beef only cov…
This ties in nicely with the theme of https://t.co/QzerPVy8hT think about the choices you make.
RT @Irishwildlife: Farming orgs are right to highlight the low cost of food and the link to greater environmental standards. This paper s…
RT @Irishwildlife: Farming orgs are right to highlight the low cost of food and the link to greater environmental standards. This paper s…
RT @whittledaway: Is this what farming reps mean when they say they want people to pay more for food? Doubling the price of beef only cov…
RT @Irishwildlife: Farming orgs are right to highlight the low cost of food and the link to greater environmental standards. This paper s…
Is this what farming reps mean when they say they want people to pay more for food? Doubling the price of beef only covers GHG emissions, not even the water pollution, extinction or health impacts - and is based on a carbon price that's half what it migh
Farming orgs are right to highlight the low cost of food and the link to greater environmental standards. This paper shows the increases in shelf prices consumers would have to pay were climate (not extinction or other pollution) costs included 👀 1/5 h
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
#agriculture #climat #carbone #élevage 1 papier du Guardian passé inaperçu pendant la trève des confiseurs. https://t.co/9BoHc6Cxnt Faudrait lire en détail l'étude mentionnée https://t.co/g53W43VTae mais on pressent déjà que #vegan, partisans de #cellag &a
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
@GeorgeMonbiot @dpcarrington To follow up on this. I cheekily emailed the lead author of https://t.co/Boij0AnTha @1maxpieper He very kindly replied to confirm that soil carbon is not factored in. This discussion has some way to run I feel
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
Great paper about GHG emissions from food! (the econ part is shaky, but its easier to discuss CO2 in euros than kgs, so why not!) https://t.co/BwLNRrY6HH
*produces sensationalist documentary "Apocalypse Cow" then says - don't get your science from TV... Is George secretly American? Because he doesn't seem to understand irony
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
@SoilAssociation @GeorgeMonbiot @dpcarrington Thanks for pointing out the importance of looking at the studies themselves. And here's a link (open access!) https://t.co/HDuSLO5okz
@keithalexander media, the NFU, ag magazines, videos, etc https://t.co/Q8vwHHXd1v
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
@sarah_gioia @mitchellscomet @mdgf_91 @CNBC @CNBCMakeIt They blocked me but yeah, they should subsidize meat less and plants more. https://t.co/4wioCNvzw6 https://t.co/lCdA3ncVt7
New in @nature: the production of organic meat produces about the same greenhouse gas as non-organic meat. #organic #food #nutrition #health https://t.co/Y5ducGtP7H https://t.co/ZXsDyUMUfE
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
So, in this age of "influencers" and inducements, peer review is holy. I doubt--
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…