↓ Skip to main content

Author Correction: Recombinant collagen polypeptide as a versatile bone graft biomaterial

Overview of attention for article published in Communications Materials, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Author Correction: Recombinant collagen polypeptide as a versatile bone graft biomaterial
Published in
Communications Materials, December 2020
DOI 10.1038/s43246-020-00111-0
Authors

Hideo Fushimi, Takahiro Hiratsuka, Ai Okamura, Yoshitaka Ono, Izumi Ogura, Ichiro Nishimura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#17,509,477
of 19,762,584 outputs
Outputs from Communications Materials
#182
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#396,835
of 472,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications Materials
#97
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,762,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.