Title |
The erosion of biodiversity and biomass in the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-20217-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Renato A. F. de Lima, Alexandre A. Oliveira, Gregory R. Pitta, André L. de Gasper, Alexander C. Vibrans, Jérôme Chave, Hans ter Steege, Paulo I. Prado |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 11 | 14% |
France | 10 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
Germany | 3 | 4% |
Spain | 3 | 4% |
Israel | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
French Guiana | 1 | 1% |
Guyana | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 39 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 67 | 83% |
Scientists | 9 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 298 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 45 | 15% |
Researcher | 31 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
Other | 46 | 15% |
Unknown | 106 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 27% |
Environmental Science | 50 | 17% |
Engineering | 12 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 6% |
Unknown | 119 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 263. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#139,800
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,995
of 57,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,010
of 524,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#70
of 1,551 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,551 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.