| Title |
Economic footprint of California wildfires in 2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Sustainability, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-020-00646-7 |
| Authors |
Daoping Wang, Dabo Guan, Shupeng Zhu, Michael Mac Kinnon, Guannan Geng, Qiang Zhang, Heran Zheng, Tianyang Lei, Shuai Shao, Peng Gong, Steven J. Davis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 8% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 47 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 73% |
| Scientists | 19 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 267 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 17% |
| Researcher | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 99 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 8% |
| Engineering | 18 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 123 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 836. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,180
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Nature Sustainability
#28
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#847
of 526,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Sustainability
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.