| Title |
Classification of invasive bloodstream infections and Plasmodium falciparum malaria using autoantibodies as biomarkers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-78155-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ralf Krumkamp, Nicole Sunaina Struck, Eva Lorenz, Marlow Zimmermann, Kennedy Gyau Boahen, Nimako Sarpong, Ellis Owusu-Dabo, Gi Deok Pak, Hyon Jin Jeon, Florian Marks, Thomas Jacobs, Jürgen May, Daniel Eibach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#18,111,817
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#89,053
of 125,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#359,211
of 509,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,263
of 4,540 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,540 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.