| Title |
A fish is not a mouse: understanding differences in background genetics is critical for reproducibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lab Animal, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41684-020-00683-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcus J. Crim, Christian Lawrence |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 13% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Estonia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 50% |
| Scientists | 28 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#871,296
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Lab Animal
#8
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,694
of 518,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lab Animal
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.