| Title |
Transdermal microneedles for the programmable burst release of multiple vaccine payloads
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biomedical Engineering, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41551-020-00650-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Khanh T. M. Tran, Tyler D. Gavitt, Nicholas J. Farrell, Eli J. Curry, Arlind B. Mara, Avi Patel, Lindsey Brown, Shawn Kilpatrick, Roxana Piotrowska, Neha Mishra, Steven M. Szczepanek, Thanh D. Nguyen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| India | 2 | 6% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Georgia | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 64% |
| Scientists | 9 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 15% |
| Engineering | 19 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#561,250
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#360
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,551
of 527,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#18
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.