RT @Arrrdrachen: Das unabhängige #CyberGericht der #DCRPV hat in F3 entschieden, dass "keinen fick geben" durchaus vulgär ist. Durch das di…
RT @Arrrdrachen: Das unabhängige #CyberGericht der #DCRPV hat in F3 entschieden, dass "keinen fick geben" durchaus vulgär ist. Durch das di…
Das unabhängige #CyberGericht der #DCRPV hat in F3 entschieden, dass "keinen fick geben" durchaus vulgär ist. Durch das direkt auf den vulgäre Ausdruck folgende Wörtchen "bzw." bzw. "beziehungsweise" wird die vorhergehende Aussage relativiert.👩⚖️
@srfdata @SRGSSR @srfnews @SRF @juerrgtschirren, @BlumRoger vielen Dank für die Arbeit. Hier das ganze wunderschöne Dokument. Ihr gebt wirklich keinen Fick😉 auf #SaveYourDemocracy: https://t.co/so7htdgIWW @ewarren Wählern wird @finkd nicht freiwillig ein
Facebook is now allowing people to share that they are registered to vote in #GE19 . There’s evidence that this kind of sharing does indeed encourage voting and other forms of participation, e.g. https://t.co/c4MHAgNYWd https://t.co/YHCxUntVsi
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
A reminder of the power of social influence. 2012 paper led by my mentor/colleague James Fowler
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
They better have reported a power analysis
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
Woah
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
".. an RCT of political mobilization messages delivered to 61 million Facebook users during the 2010 US congressional elections....the messages directly affected.. real-world voting behaviour of millions of people... also (influenced) the users’ friends, a
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
Interesting study via @sjblakemore
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
RT @sjblakemore: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization https://t.co/fIkYRrRrIP
Here's an observation... One thing that struck me yesterday was the message social media = bad... But we can to use social marketing to change behaviour. Facebook actually managed to change behaviour (voting) in an enormous experimental study (https://t.
@CarahOng @facebook @demworks Thanks! Here's the study on the I Voted widget: https://t.co/KUwbJcpiBP
@SergioLujambio @majamx19 Y para Facebook no ha sido ningún secreto la capacidad que tienen sus interacciones de conducir y manipular en consecuencia el comportamiento de sus usuarios. Adam Kramer es el encargado de investigación de comportamiento humano
RT @cordeliers: @AOC On the mind control experiments mentioned above: https://t.co/3lQAbG1Sh6
RT @cordeliers: @AOC On the mind control experiments mentioned above: https://t.co/3lQAbG1Sh6
RT @cordeliers: @AOC On the mind control experiments mentioned above: https://t.co/3lQAbG1Sh6
RT @cordeliers: @AOC On the mind control experiments mentioned above: https://t.co/3lQAbG1Sh6
RT @cordeliers: @AOC On the mind control experiments mentioned above: https://t.co/3lQAbG1Sh6
RT @meehancrist: Translation: scientists used Facebook to do behavioral experiments that directly influenced voting in congressional electi…
RT @meehancrist: Translation: scientists used Facebook to do behavioral experiments that directly influenced voting in congressional electi…
RT @meehancrist: Translation: scientists used Facebook to do behavioral experiments that directly influenced voting in congressional electi…
Translation: scientists used Facebook to do behavioral experiments that directly influenced voting in congressional elections. (via @cordeliers) https://t.co/VEk4pqhYZw
RT @cordeliers: @AOC On the mind control experiments mentioned above: https://t.co/3lQAbG1Sh6
RT @cordeliers: @AOC On the mind control experiments mentioned above: https://t.co/3lQAbG1Sh6
RT @cordeliers: @AOC On the mind control experiments mentioned above: https://t.co/3lQAbG1Sh6
@AOC On the mind control experiments mentioned above: https://t.co/3lQAbG1Sh6
@juliancole True the Big 5 personality piece might be overblown. BUT 1. Ad engagement influences peoples' news feeds, taking them down rabbit holes. 2. FB activity has very real voter effects, a la this 'experiment' on 61MM people: https://t.co/tyVKgI7B
RT @LangstrumpfPipo: @multidissimo @srfnews Hier wurden beispielsweise diverse Studienergebnisse totgeschwiegen: https://t.co/pf4AEBFCr7 Fa…
RT @jengolbeck: @KeelonStarr @ewarren Facebook themselves published a paper indicating that they had the power to influence the vote: https…
@multidissimo @srfnews Hier wurden beispielsweise diverse Studienergebnisse totgeschwiegen: https://t.co/pf4AEBFCr7 Facebook kann mit dem Go-Vote-button Wahlen entscheiden. Zuckerberg wird bei @ewarren -Wählern wohl kaum einen solchen anzeigen. #SaveYourDe
RT @christianpipal: @bnbakker @poli_com I liked these two quite a lot: https://t.co/cp0kJn0x7I and https://t.co/WmkZp6urAu. The latter is a…
@bnbakker @poli_com I liked these two quite a lot: https://t.co/cp0kJn0x7I and https://t.co/WmkZp6urAu. The latter is also a good example of problematic research ethics in online experiments.
Finds übrigens besonders interessant in Kombination mit Facebooks Feldexperiment 2010. Alleine das einblenden, dass Freunde bereits wählen waren hat die Wahlbeteiligung gesteigert. Man stelle sich vor, dass würde Zielpersonenorientiert eingeblendet. http
RT @sinanaral: Trouble is we still don't know because we haven't measured it!... Fortunately, the effect of social media manipulation on e…
Trouble is we still don't know because we haven't measured it!... Fortunately, the effect of social media manipulation on elections is imminently measurable. Tools exist to measure is effects on voting: https://t.co/2muRVJoFYa, https://t.co/uUpEZtWx8z, ht
@Pen12318 @s_r_constantin @cigardubey Why it seems that people at a a certain age group all seem to find others at the same age group with similar conditions is a fascinating thing in general. There is at least one working theory that would explain the per
RT @noii: @carlosrocha Facebook have surely been advertising to their clients that "hyper-targeted propaganda" is their main product for se…
@carlosrocha Facebook have surely been advertising to their clients that "hyper-targeted propaganda" is their main product for several years now (although not quite in those words)? I mean, Cameron's paper basically spelt out voter (de)mobilization in 2012
RT @MrWatchBird: Científicos que apoyan: La destrucción de las estadísticas. El despilfarro de los recursos públicos. La pérdida del autoab…
Científicos que apoyan: La destrucción de las estadísticas. El despilfarro de los recursos públicos. La pérdida del autoabastecimiento energético. La corrupción en todas sus formas. Qué poca memoria. Triste. #Elecciones2019
RT @jeremiasincicco: @ActEnSeguridad @haydeecinha @Exactas_UBA Hay bastante evidencia de que los actos de movilización política y de expres…
@ActEnSeguridad @haydeecinha @Exactas_UBA Hay bastante evidencia de que los actos de movilización política y de expresión de preferencias políticas tienden a contagiarse. Este es un buen estudio https://t.co/qUuyMVdBCE. Y la verdad que en CyT tenemos mucha
もとの論文はこれかな? https://t.co/g2daQyJfGg
"These results suggest that strong ties are instrumental for spreading both online and real-world behaviour in human social networks" [A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization] @nresearchnews https://t.co/pGjjdObnhh
@estilografa Esa parte es compleja. Todavía hasta la fecha se trabaja en formar marcos teóricos y de referencia para sustentar cuantitativamente las observaciones. Uno de los primeros antecedentes viene de Facebook https://t.co/lbRUme61Mk
@VRXDirtyPaws @radicles_ Also here: https://t.co/Ad7B5LA5nP. Also here: https://t.co/IB8e25dXgU We do need new researches, but in the field, this is the material we have about the subject, aside from our professional researches that we are still working on
Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295. https://t.co/6tgSP39WyG https://t.co/3EUJ
RT @OlSoGaMa: @clesaege @sionpensait @PJanuel @JC_MENARD @lemondefr Cet aspect du risque d’influence est décrite dans ce papier : une expér…
@clesaege @sionpensait @PJanuel @JC_MENARD @lemondefr Cet aspect du risque d’influence est décrite dans ce papier : une expérimentation faite par Facebook il y a qq années. On peut inciter grandement les populations et les inciter à voter sur la base du ci
RT @edmundogs: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization vía @nresearchnews artículo referido por @shos…
RT @edmundogs: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization vía @nresearchnews artículo referido por @shos…
RT @edmundogs: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization vía @nresearchnews artículo referido por @shos…
RT @edmundogs: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization vía @nresearchnews artículo referido por @shos…
Onderzoek onder 61 miljoen Amerikanen toont: mensen gaan eerder stemmen wanneer Facebook toont dat goede vrienden al gestemd hebben. HT @wilte https://t.co/lA4KIeeKOW
RT @edmundogs: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization vía @nresearchnews artículo referido por @shos…
RT @edmundogs: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization vía @nresearchnews artículo referido por @shos…
RT @edmundogs: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization vía @nresearchnews artículo referido por @shos…
61 million person experiment @TomDobber: methodologisch heel knap. Ethisch een faux pas. https://t.co/eM7xsHKy2I https://t.co/aNfLZAkajv
RT @edmundogs: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization vía @nresearchnews artículo referido por @shos…
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization vía @nresearchnews artículo referido por @shoshanazuboff https://t.co/k4oqx4Uo6U @christilcara @piscitelli @cscolari @aracalacana @julitoalonso
@talakos @yosoyene @TonyIronStark Varias precisiones. Mis afirmaciones tienen sustento y no por que lo diga yo, sino que hay estudios muy serios al respecto. Los que considero los escalones de entrada al tema son los siguientes: https://t.co/gEd0DCbkUA
@Ahura__Mazda Creo que te puede interesar este: https://t.co/lbRUme61Mk
2 sides to the argument, you can’t argue with evidence!!
@HehmanLab Here's Bond et al. (2012) justifying their effect sizes which explain < 0.5% of the variance in their study that was published in Nature. https://t.co/mXiROcozNN https://t.co/Vu6iNyI5Oo
@NateSilver538 @BrendanNyhan (The Nature paper, by the way. I think the second one is more impressive in finding because methods are even tighter, learning from the first. https://t.co/W4w2v57RwF)