| Title |
HIV vaccine controversy
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature Biotechnology, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nbt0308-256a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
KS Jayaraman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 50% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 464. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#49,324
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#97
of 8,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57
of 80,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.