| Title |
Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative genomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2873-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaohong Feng, Josefin Stiller, Yuan Deng, Joel Armstrong, Qi Fang, Andrew Hart Reeve, Duo Xie, Guangji Chen, Chunxue Guo, Brant C. Faircloth, Bent Petersen, Zongji Wang, Qi Zhou, Mark Diekhans, Wanjun Chen, Sergio Andreu-Sánchez, Ashot Margaryan, Jason Travis Howard, Carole Parent, George Pacheco, Mikkel-Holger S. Sinding, Lara Puetz, Emily Cavill, Ângela M. Ribeiro, Leopold Eckhart, Jon Fjeldså, Peter A. Hosner, Robb T. Brumfield, Les Christidis, Mads F. Bertelsen, Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten, Dieter Thomas Tietze, Bruce C. Robertson, Gang Song, Gerald Borgia, Santiago Claramunt, Irby J. Lovette, Saul J. Cowen, Peter Njoroge, John Philip Dumbacher, Oliver A. Ryder, Jérôme Fuchs, Michael Bunce, David W. Burt, Joel Cracraft, Guanliang Meng, Shannon J. Hackett, Peter G. Ryan, Knud Andreas Jønsson, Ian G. Jamieson, Rute R. da Fonseca, Edward L. Braun, Peter Houde, Siavash Mirarab, Alexander Suh, Bengt Hansson, Suvi Ponnikas, Hanna Sigeman, Martin Stervander, Paul B. Frandsen, Henriette van der Zwan, Rencia van der Sluis, Carina Visser, Christopher N. Balakrishnan, Andrew G. Clark, John W. Fitzpatrick, Reed Bowman, Nancy Chen, Alison Cloutier, Timothy B. Sackton, Scott V. Edwards, Dustin J. Foote, Subir B. Shakya, Frederick H. Sheldon, Alain Vignal, André E. R. Soares, Beth Shapiro, Jacob González-Solís, Joan Ferrer-Obiol, Julio Rozas, Marta Riutort, Anna Tigano, Vicki Friesen, Love Dalén, Araxi O. Urrutia, Tamás Székely, Yang Liu, Michael G. Campana, André Corvelo, Robert C. Fleischer, Kim M. Rutherford, Neil J. Gemmell, Nicolas Dussex, Henrik Mouritsen, Nadine Thiele, Kira Delmore, Miriam Liedvogel, Andre Franke, Marc P. Hoeppner, Oliver Krone, Adam M. Fudickar, Borja Milá, Ellen D. Ketterson, Andrew Eric Fidler, Guillermo Friis, Ángela M. Parody-Merino, Phil F. Battley, Murray P. Cox, Nicholas Costa Barroso Lima, Francisco Prosdocimi, Thomas Lee Parchman, Barney A. Schlinger, Bette A. Loiselle, John G. Blake, Haw Chuan Lim, Lainy B. Day, Matthew J. Fuxjager, Maude W. Baldwin, Michael J. Braun, Morgan Wirthlin, Rebecca B. Dikow, T. Brandt Ryder, Glauco Camenisch, Lukas F. Keller, Jeffrey M. DaCosta, Mark E. Hauber, Matthew I. M. Louder, Christopher C. Witt, Jimmy A. McGuire, Joann Mudge, Libby C. Megna, Matthew D. Carling, Biao Wang, Scott A. Taylor, Glaucia Del-Rio, Alexandre Aleixo, Ana Tereza Ribeiro Vasconcelos, Claudio V. Mello, Jason T. Weir, David Haussler, Qiye Li, Huanming Yang, Jian Wang, Fumin Lei, Carsten Rahbek, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Gary R. Graves, Erich D. Jarvis, Benedict Paten, Guojie Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 781 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 100 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 56 | 7% |
| Spain | 47 | 6% |
| Germany | 27 | 3% |
| Japan | 21 | 3% |
| France | 18 | 2% |
| Mexico | 17 | 2% |
| Colombia | 14 | 2% |
| Brazil | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 150 | 19% |
| Unknown | 318 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 452 | 58% |
| Scientists | 304 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 508 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 18% |
| Researcher | 76 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 13% |
| Unknown | 149 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 154 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 107 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 7% |
| Unknown | 177 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 797. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#24,174
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,315
of 98,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#908
of 436,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#77
of 901 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 901 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.