| Title |
COVID-19 treatments and pathogenesis including anosmia in K18-hACE2 mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2943-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jian Zheng, Lok-Yin Roy Wong, Kun Li, Abhishek Kumar Verma, Miguel E. Ortiz, Christine Wohlford-Lenane, Mariah R. Leidinger, C. Michael Knudson, David K. Meyerholz, Paul B. McCray, Stanley Perlman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 208 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 11% |
| Japan | 10 | 5% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 135 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 184 | 88% |
| Scientists | 16 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 343 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 11% |
| Researcher | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 13% |
| Unknown | 133 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 31 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 141 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#175,408
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#10,731
of 98,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,964
of 440,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#271
of 904 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 904 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.