| Title |
Solid cyclooctatetraene-based triplet quencher demonstrating excellent suppression of singlet–triplet annihilation in optical and electrical excitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-19443-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Van T. N. Mai, Viqar Ahmad, Masashi Mamada, Toshiya Fukunaga, Atul Shukla, Jan Sobus, Gowri Krishnan, Evan G. Moore, Gunther G. Andersson, Chihaya Adachi, Ebinazar B. Namdas, Shih-Chun Lo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 33% |
| Saint Lucia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 13 | 39% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,630,889
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#26,910
of 47,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,871
of 420,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#973
of 1,582 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,582 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.