| Title |
Guide RNAs: it’s good to be choosy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-020-01003-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivien Marx |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 55% |
| Scientists | 24 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,026,843
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,330
of 5,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,471
of 441,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#28
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.