Title |
Lymph makes you fat
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Genetics, October 2005
|
DOI | 10.1038/ng1005-1023 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martin Schneider, Edward M Conway, Peter Carmeliet |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 20% |
Professor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,817,174
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#4,278
of 7,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,862
of 59,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#23
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.