| Title |
Factors influencing contraceptive use or non-use among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-020-01004-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline Coombe, Amy E. Anderson, Natalie Townsend, Kym M. Rae, Stephanie Gilbert, Lyniece Keogh, Christine Corby, Deborah Loxton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 75% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,185,637
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#350
of 1,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,382
of 415,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.