Title |
Author Correction: An atlas of dynamic chromatin landscapes in mouse fetal development
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2841-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David U. Gorkin, Iros Barozzi, Yuan Zhao, Yanxiao Zhang, Hui Huang, Ah Young Lee, Bin Li, Joshua Chiou, Andre Wildberg, Bo Ding, Bo Zhang, Mengchi Wang, J. Seth Strattan, Jean M. Davidson, Yunjiang Qiu, Veena Afzal, Jennifer A. Akiyama, Ingrid Plajzer-Frick, Catherine S. Novak, Momoe Kato, Tyler H. Garvin, Quan T. Pham, Anne N. Harrington, Brandon J. Mannion, Elizabeth A. Lee, Yoko Fukuda-Yuzawa, Yupeng He, Sebastian Preissl, Sora Chee, Jee Yun Han, Brian A. Williams, Diane Trout, Henry Amrhein, Hongbo Yang, J. Michael Cherry, Wei Wang, Kyle Gaulton, Joseph R. Ecker, Yin Shen, Diane E. Dickel, Axel Visel, Len A. Pennacchio, Bing Ren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 17% |
Germany | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 67% |
Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,628,840
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#66,112
of 91,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,974
of 415,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#814
of 847 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 847 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.