| Title |
Whose morality? Which rationality? Challenging artificial intelligence as a remedy for the lack of moral enhancement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-020-00614-8 |
| Authors |
Silviya Serafimova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Engineering | 7 | 12% |
| Philosophy | 6 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,944,160
of 23,730,866 outputs
Outputs from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#218
of 1,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,100
of 416,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#22
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,730,866 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.