| Title |
Health anxiety and attentional bias toward virus-related stimuli during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-73599-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loreta Cannito, Adolfo Di Crosta, Rocco Palumbo, Irene Ceccato, Stefano Anzani, Pasquale La Malva, Riccardo Palumbo, Alberto Di Domenico |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 51 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 40 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,085,380
of 25,121,692 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#26,239
of 138,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,728
of 420,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#860
of 4,262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,121,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.