| Title |
Innovations present in the primate interneuron repertoire
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2781-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fenna M. Krienen, Melissa Goldman, Qiangge Zhang, Ricardo C. H. del Rosario, Marta Florio, Robert Machold, Arpiar Saunders, Kirsten Levandowski, Heather Zaniewski, Benjamin Schuman, Carolyn Wu, Alyssa Lutservitz, Christopher D. Mullally, Nora Reed, Elizabeth Bien, Laura Bortolin, Marian Fernandez-Otero, Jessica D. Lin, Alec Wysoker, James Nemesh, David Kulp, Monika Burns, Victor Tkachev, Richard Smith, Christopher A. Walsh, Jordane Dimidschstein, Bernardo Rudy, Leslie S. Kean, Sabina Berretta, Gord Fishell, Guoping Feng, Steven A. McCarroll |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 209 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 68 | 33% |
| Canada | 9 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Japan | 6 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 79 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 116 | 56% |
| Scientists | 87 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 300 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 100 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 80 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#253,139
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#14,297
of 98,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,638
of 433,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#357
of 824 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 824 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.