@TrackingCovid Take a look at this article about influenza. It concludes that natural antibodies from infection produce more antibodies than a vaccine. Please spare me mRNA argument. mRNA is not predicated on "real world experience" for the body. https:/
T-cell responses following Natural Influenza Infection or Vaccination in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. https://t.co/f4r6cOLLqZ
This is one of countless studies that show immune responses are far more robust from natural infection. There is no - and I mean *no* - vaccine in this category that induces a better immune response than natural infection. https://t.co/fL6Viu7C3F https://
The lockdowns were short sighted in regards to future public health concerns. The youth need to be introduced to the real thing for the purpose of long term t cell memory (https://t.co/a0sDVWCpiX). True infections provide for more robust protections (https
@ByronYork Fun combo read: https://t.co/FMmXyLe8mq. "Infection elicits significantly stronger CD4+ responses compared to the influenza vaccine and thereby likely elicits better protection against reinfection."
@TheLastPersont2 @velvet12 @CarlSul80702319 Hmm, the first article I have found is a study of strength comparisons of vaccine v natural T-cell strenht in transplant patients. And this data seems to contradict your interview data. https://t.co/S2bo8G7OJ1
@RavehTaltal @AsafRonel גם לתגובת תאי T יש זמן חיים מוגבל. למשל בשפעת עונתית, זמן מחצית החיים הממוצע של תגובת תאי T הוא כ-7 חודשים. למיטב הבנתי, ב- COVID מדובר על כחודשיים הן מבחינת נוגדנים אפקטיביים, והן מבחינת זמן מחצית החיים של תגובת תאי T. מחקר בנושא