↓ Skip to main content

Reply to ‘Forward models of repetition suppression depend critically on assumptions of noise and granularity’

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Reply to ‘Forward models of repetition suppression depend critically on assumptions of noise and granularity’
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18316-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arjen Alink, Hunar Abdulrahman, Richard N. Henson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Neuroscience 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,004,037
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#36,500
of 48,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,875
of 408,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,264
of 1,567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.