@JC47053522 @aaron_oakley @NukeForClimate @dorfman_p You get to have both. Existing ming and mining in areas never mined before. https://t.co/64RLwK6Zmn
@2of2card @martinrev21 The assumption about 'billionaires' is that there are "carbon-free" alternatives to what they do. There are not, because they create other problems. For example: https://t.co/7gJtJPehz0 We have to restrict consumption of 'affluent'
@OrmeStephan @drvolts If you think that only area is an issue - think again: https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@Zasteroid @ECOWARRIORSS Listen carefully to go renewable we have to intensify mining and we need the energy to process all the materials. The renewable drive is bad for the enviroment, follow the science. https://t.co/Mrvxf73ZDZ
@drvolts Indeed, we need more mining and processing in new locations as I understand: https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@alanpater @PoliticOfNature Yes, but we need new mines in new locations: https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@AlecStapp Science: https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@LianSinclair @DMacSyd Yes, there are still risks as new materials needed mining in new places, it is reasonable to reduce energy demand in addition to replacing energy generation supply. https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@zalisteggall Where the Australian Industry Energy Transitions Initiative impact studies on this energy transition? Reading Sonter & all from QLD uni. we should be all worried with this as this energy transition is far from being sustainable. https:/
@BrowntownBrew @sydney_ev @SenatorRennick Sure, let's just "destroy the planet", the environment, and biodiversity to "save the world". https://t.co/64RLwK6Zmn
@HozaCatama @JaydenW67403763 @SenatorRennick I am not pro-coal. But the fact that you felt the need to label me, does indicate "your" bias. https://t.co/64RLwK6Zmn
@prinz_tweet @fwn_science Hope this helps https://t.co/Mrvxf73ZDZ
@MikeHudema How dare u talk about biodiversity and fresh water when your model is doing so much harm as well! https://t.co/7YkTM5ehsP
@dorfman_p Cheapest maybe but not sustainable. "Careful strategic planning is urgently required to ensure that mining threats to biodiversity caused by renewable energy production do not surpass the threats averted by climate change mitigation..." https:/
@MikeHudema "Careful strategic planning is urgently required to ensure that mining threats to biodiversity caused by renewable energy production do not surpass the threats averted by climate change mitigation..." Not 1 gov. has strategic planning in place!
@Outy5000 @WendyHarmon19 Here is a basic discussion regarding the threats to biodiversity caused by mining the materials to needed to produce renewable energy plants. https://t.co/7FRSD5118u
@ncorroch @SamuelBonneau @EVANVAERENBERGH "Renewable energy production will exacerbate mining threats to biodiversity" https://t.co/4yMRyJYNt8
@FerracinThierry @McMarghem "Renewable energy production will exacerbate mining threats to biodiversity" https://t.co/4yMRyJYNt8
@PhilipHermann @McMarghem Vous vous imaginez à Disneyland. Votre transition énergétique n'adviendra JAMAIS. https://t.co/4yMRyJYNt8
@manuelpourtois @MassartJulien1 @MathieuVVyve L'extraction minière démulitpliée +300% à +900%, x21 pour le lithium pour atteindre les objectifs de la "transition énergétique" relève de l'absurdité la plus totale. Cela fera exploser littéralement l'usage de
@vendalfff @MarianneBoust Sinon une discussion autour d'un bel article dans NATURE: https://t.co/gflbaZ85zQ https://t.co/5n1EGjLepQ
@stephanehis Celui-ci ? https://t.co/9KA6fTmMEh
@MassartJulien1 @MathieuVVyve Les sites miniers abandonnés sont environnementalement et sanitairement bien plus dangereux que les déchets nucléaires et parfois pour des centaines d'années. Rappelons que l'extraction minière démultipliée est sine qua non à
@benoitpraderie Vous faites l'autruche, Monsieur Écocide? https://t.co/4yMRyJYNt8
@benoitpraderie Nature serait d'extrême-droite? https://t.co/MvMOIvbsyw
@benoitpraderie Transition énergétique = écocide? https://t.co/4yMRyJZliG
RT @Le_Reveilleur: Au passage, c'est un article dans Nature Communications qui a 160 citations. https://t.co/t0sH1tXDqn C'est un papier…
RT @Le_Reveilleur: Pourquoi "plus ou moins" ? Parce que la source est au CONDITIONNEL (il n'y a pas du tout de "probablement" qui n'a rien…
RT @Le_Reveilleur: Pourquoi "plus ou moins" ? Parce que la source est au CONDITIONNEL (il n'y a pas du tout de "probablement" qui n'a rien…
Au passage, c'est un article dans Nature Communications qui a 160 citations. https://t.co/t0sH1tXDqn C'est un papier très cité donc perçu comme crédible et influençant le reste de la littérature. Ma déception est grande.
RT @qbas81: @the_antrik @KevinClimate @virtual_dreame @Tesla @remblance_erin You are incorrect. There are significant risks: https://t.co/…
@the_antrik @KevinClimate @virtual_dreame @Tesla @remblance_erin You are incorrect. There are significant risks: https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@petrogustavo Defina energía limpia por favor https://t.co/A1bJqBbkcF
RT @rouxad27: L'affirmation se base exclusivement sur l'étude suivante, de Sonter et al. https://t.co/KCTBQAT20l https://t.co/9o1Pb91Y9M
@GabrielMalek9 @Thinker_View Les vidéos d'une personne qui cause, sans contradicteur, seraient donc une source d'information fiable ? Un beau debunkage en règle https://t.co/IP5NK1ddt1 La source de ses affirmations. https://t.co/Sc3Dj6e4v4
@Senator_JScherl @dorfman_p No. Renewable strategies essentially replace the mining of oil with the mining of metals. It's all extractive, and globally extractive industries do the most damage. That's no different for renewable energy: https://t.co/7gJtJP
@invest_answers I wouldn't be so confident on resources. 1st: this level of mining would be an ecological disaster: https://t.co/Cll9ax1MJO 2nd: Deep sea mining is source of most number on total metal available. And these numbers are NOT reliable (as per
L'affirmation se base exclusivement sur l'étude suivante, de Sonter et al. https://t.co/KCTBQAT20l https://t.co/9o1Pb91Y9M
@pimarty86 J'ai trouvé la source (comme la plupart des intervenants de ces chaines "d'information" elle raconte toujours la même chose, je suis allé chercher dans une autre vidéo) : https://t.co/HyK5dEAtPE
@KetanJ0 @GretaThunberg On global scale risks for environment are non-trivial. https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
RT @Drei86: Secondly: "Mining threats to biodiversity will increase as more mines target materials for renewable energy production and, wi…
Secondly: "Mining threats to biodiversity will increase as more mines target materials for renewable energy production and, without strategic planning, these new threats to biodiversity may surpass those averted by climate change mitigation." https://t.c
@matteoofin @whilecromar Shhhh, le rinnovabili non hanno alcun impatto https://t.co/bhTg1zDiLS
@NotEnergyBlind @Kalydyskope @HowKeen Well, articles such as this… At least they used “will” not the usual “may”.. But “threats”? Mining destroys ecosystems, it’s not a threat - it actually happens. That’s the reality. And of course the authors had to fini
RT @KersevanRoberto: #risorsePianeta @gbrussato "Ma la rivoluzione energetica 'verdeh'!" Tutto OK, circolare!😬🤯 "Le minacce minerarie al…
#risorsePianeta @gbrussato "Ma la rivoluzione energetica 'verdeh'!" Tutto OK, circolare!😬🤯 "Le minacce minerarie alla biodiversità aumenteranno man mano che più miniere prendono di mira materiali per la produzione di energia rinnovabile..." https://t.c
@curious_founder All true, however issue is that materials needed are in different locations and processing often generates toxic waste. We need renewable energy but it's risky business. https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@TobyArnott2B @JMPyper Yes, there are serious risks involved, not only with cobalt. https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@imdavidbryan @antonioguterres I am not saying that way forward is without any risks - we need #degrowth to reduce consumption fast, but you exacerbating threats and issues. https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
RT @juanman98330028: @GIAndradeP Profe mire este artículo https://t.co/A1bJqBbS2d
@GIAndradeP Profe mire este artículo https://t.co/A1bJqBbS2d
RT @juanman98330028: @AdrianCorrea @IreneVelezT @AlvaroPardo8 @javiercjz @petrogustavo @FranciaMarquezM @laurisarabia Energías limpias ? Es…
@AdrianCorrea @IreneVelezT @AlvaroPardo8 @javiercjz @petrogustavo @FranciaMarquezM @laurisarabia Energías limpias ? Esta muy de moda repetir y repetir ese adjetivo de "limpias", la verdad no es tan así y el costo que puede tener en la biodiversidad y los e
RT @Karmageddon67: @visaskn Actually many of these mines will involve destruction of habitat and carbon sequestration, not “cheese and the…
RT @Karmageddon67: @visaskn Actually many of these mines will involve destruction of habitat and carbon sequestration, not “cheese and the…
RT @Karmageddon67: Actually many of these mines will involve destruction of habitat and carbon sequestration, not “cheese and the Alps”. Wh…
RT @Karmageddon67: Actually many of these mines will involve destruction of habitat and carbon sequestration, not “cheese and the Alps”. Wh…
RT @Karmageddon67: @visaskn Actually many of these mines will involve destruction of habitat and carbon sequestration, not “cheese and the…
@TobyArnott2B @visaskn Actually many of these mines will involve destruction of habitat and carbon sequestration, not “cheese and the Alps”. What a woefully disingenuous thread. https://t.co/Zbwpzfuv34
Actually many of these mines will involve destruction of habitat and carbon sequestration, not “cheese and the Alps”. What a woefully disingenuous thread. https://t.co/Zbwpzfuv34
@visaskn Actually many of these mines will involve destruction of habitat and carbon sequestration, not “cheese and the Alps”. What a woefully disingenuous thread. https://t.co/Zbwpzfuv34
RT @qbas81: @HMNorthey @EENewsUpdates @politico We definitely need batteries and electrification but have to think about this too: https:/…
@HMNorthey @EENewsUpdates @politico We definitely need batteries and electrification but have to think about this too: https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@gerardreid14 That may require quite a lot of increase in minerals supply. https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@erikengheim @CrisprCAS97 @PaulieIsHere @surfNDestroy @antonioguterres As well as massive ecocide and very significant increases in extinctions. https://t.co/Zbwpzfuv34
Si on considère les interdép climat-écosystèmes et les effets de retour de la biodiv sur le climat, alors tte mine est un pb qque soit le minerai. C'est + un pb si c'est du charbon mais mm du lithium est pbtique. Cf. e.g. cette ref: https://t.co/PnsiAh4AZ
@danmiller999 @ArtForCC @dmichie66 @RadReduction @Snial @KevinClimate We would mine much less, but in different places from current mining - possibly increasing damages. https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
RT @Karmageddon67: @ClimateHuman Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in…
@earthislandjrnl @mongabay Big risks ahead: https://t.co/QMbY2jQS4W
@daisymccrackin @great_thunberg Is that what you've been told, or what you choose to believe? https://t.co/7gJtJPehz0
RT @Karmageddon67: @ClimateHuman Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in…
RT @Karmageddon67: Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in the Amazon bas…
RT @Karmageddon67: Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in the Amazon bas…
RT @Karmageddon67: @ClimateHuman Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in…
RT @Karmageddon67: @ClimateHuman Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in…
RT @Karmageddon67: @ClimateHuman Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in…
RT @Karmageddon67: Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in the Amazon bas…
RT @Karmageddon67: Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in the Amazon bas…
@ClimateHuman Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in the Amazon basin. What would be the climate science narrative? “We need to destroy the Amazon to save the climate?” Well that’s happ
@Gergyl @ClimateHuman Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in the Amazon basin. What would be the climate science narrative? “We need to destroy the Amazon to save the climate?” Well tha
Imagine if large scale deposits of lithium, rare earths, cobalt, nickel, copper & graphite, were found in the Amazon basin. What would be the climate science narrative? “We need to destroy the Amazon to save the climate?” Well that’s happening already.
Will @maura_healey take into consideration the impacts of lithium mining in places like the DRC when she doubles solar capacity? @
RT @Karmageddon67: @_HannahRitchie And we supposedly care about biodiversity, right? Lithium mining emissions can be as high as 15-22 t C…