@voice_hard @ShaneFs5cents @JulieScribbler @NOAAClimate No 1) I'm saying we know how much water expands at specific temps and can apply this to the oceans. Do you deny this? 2) Ice loss is more unpredictable, but currently: https://t.co/FzvvpuEHOT
@voice_hard @ShaneFs5cents @JulieScribbler @NOAAClimate Models are fine: https://t.co/FzvvpuEHOT and https://t.co/U9YAyycGxE
@voice_hard @ShaneFs5cents @JulieScribbler @NOAAClimate What makes you think the oceans won't expand by a known amount per degree of warming? Note also https://t.co/FzvvpuEHOT
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
RT @PCarterClimate: ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario.…
ICE SHEET MASS LOSS TRACKS WORST-CASE Mass loss Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets tracks RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario. Rapid loss Greenland & Antarctica continues. Disastrously large sea level rise commitment https://t.co/aS8C0ylqg8 #climatechange
@stimmtdochgarn1 @Jbuck9797 @ProfBillMcGuire Did you read any of the papers linked in the guardian article? https://t.co/dEMAdRB4r1
@mpclimate I thought it was accepted that Greenland mass loss had been underestimated by AR5 (https://t.co/ngwUoyweh9) My previous comparison with the budget from Frederikse et al. 2020: https://t.co/OUhJDy8mjd
@Mydrryn @arcanebear @ScottAdamsSays I am really not https://t.co/FzvvpuEHOT
RT @batidivulga: Los mantos de #hielo de la #Antártida se monitorizan por #satélite desde los años 90. En ese periodo, se calcula que su fu…
Los mantos de #hielo de la #Antártida se monitorizan por #satélite desde los años 90. En ese periodo, se calcula que su fusión ha contribuido a un aumento global del nivel del #mar de 7,2 mm. https://t.co/9xUcWHiZNj
Los mantos de #hielo de la #Antártida se monitorizan por #satélite desde los años 90. En ese periodo, se calcula que su fusión ha contribuido a un aumento global del nivel del #mar de 7,2 mm. https://t.co/QA4Yvj7cFs
Here's the relevant study https://t.co/37WLElQ6JZ
@PhilipposRacso @AcabEnby @IbaraEleven False, we’re also warming way faster than anticipated and increasing fossil fuel production https://t.co/KFjo2QvYqX
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again. https://t.co/SHlwNAzEzM
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.
RT @EcoSenseNow: So “scientific proof” is in a computer model that contains all your assumptions? Try again.