Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD1Ak @ScottDoney1 https://t.co/wR0mUoGOzv
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @gcarbonproject: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/GPXC…
Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/GPXC4dxJtX @ScottDoney1 https://t.co/Wu6Ylqh6Ua
RT @wang_seaver: New @NatureClimate paper assesses direct air carbon capture to have a potential to capture 7% of global CO2 emissions, but…
RT @wang_seaver: New @NatureClimate paper assesses direct air carbon capture to have a potential to capture 7% of global CO2 emissions, but…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @andresclarens: And you can read our blog post describing the work to the Nature Sustainability Community here: https://t.co/ebiOpjEkyi
RT @andresclarens: And you can read our blog post describing the work to the Nature Sustainability Community here: https://t.co/ebiOpjEkyi…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @wang_seaver: New @NatureClimate paper assesses direct air carbon capture to have a potential to capture 7% of global CO2 emissions, but…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @Luis_I_Gomez: Venga! A secuestrar CO2! "... This could result in staple food crop prices rising by approximately fivefold relative to…
'Negative emissions technologies may not solve climate crisis' https://t.co/VM3owCZuTg via @ScienceDaily '...could result in staple food crop prices rising by approx. fivefold relative to 2010 levels in many parts of the Global South' https://t.co/4VglVWf
RT @wang_seaver: New @NatureClimate paper assesses direct air carbon capture to have a potential to capture 7% of global CO2 emissions, but…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @Luis_I_Gomez: Venga! A secuestrar CO2! "... This could result in staple food crop prices rising by approximately fivefold relative to…
RT @Luis_I_Gomez: Venga! A secuestrar CO2! "... This could result in staple food crop prices rising by approximately fivefold relative to…
Venga! A secuestrar CO2! "... This could result in staple food crop prices rising by approximately fivefold relative to 2010 levels in many parts of the Global South." Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future h
RT @wang_seaver: New @NatureClimate paper assesses direct air carbon capture to have a potential to capture 7% of global CO2 emissions, but…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @wang_seaver: New @NatureClimate paper assesses direct air carbon capture to have a potential to capture 7% of global CO2 emissions, but…
RT @wang_seaver: New @NatureClimate paper assesses direct air carbon capture to have a potential to capture 7% of global CO2 emissions, but…
RT @3y419: Direct Air Capture promises to be a crucial building block for +1.5 degree future. Our new paper in @NatureClimate discusses maj…
RT @3y419: Direct Air Capture promises to be a crucial building block for +1.5 degree future. Our new paper in @NatureClimate discusses maj…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @mammuthus: Accompanying this is paper quantifying some of the benefits and trade-offs of DAC compared to BECCS. DAC has big energy and…
RT @3y419: Direct Air Capture promises to be a crucial building block for +1.5 degree future. Our new paper in @NatureClimate discusses maj…
RT @3y419: Direct Air Capture promises to be a crucial building block for +1.5 degree future. Our new paper in @NatureClimate discusses maj…
RT @3y419: Direct Air Capture promises to be a crucial building block for +1.5 degree future. Our new paper in @NatureClimate discusses maj…
We likely need to develop & deploy DAC to avoid the worst effects of climate change. But we should also be clear-eyed about moral hazard risk. This study illustrates what we know intuitively: Any delay in mitigation in favor of future DAC exacerbates
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @mammuthus: Accompanying this is paper quantifying some of the benefits and trade-offs of DAC compared to BECCS. DAC has big energy and…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
The full paper: https://t.co/Eq6pXmTurM
UVA professors and researchers Jay Fuhrman, Bill Shobe, Scott Doney and Andres Clarens are co-authors of the article published today in the monthly journal Nature Climate Change. @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UVAEngineers @bill_shobe @UVACooperCent
Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future https://t.co/fqiQCoPgBv #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency #GlobalWarming #SaveThePlanet
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
Interesting.
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @wang_seaver: New @NatureClimate paper assesses direct air carbon capture to have a potential to capture 7% of global CO2 emissions, but…
New @NatureClimate paper assesses direct air carbon capture to have a potential to capture 7% of global CO2 emissions, but identifies high energy + water use concerns. DAC can alleviate some land + fertilizer demand from BECCS/afforestation, but these impa
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
https://t.co/ew96Oi2CIK #climatechange Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future
Accompanying this is paper quantifying some of the benefits and trade-offs of DAC compared to BECCS. DAC has big energy and water requirements, whereas BECCS uses vast areas of land. Big implications for food supply. No major shocks, but useful https://t.c
RT @andresclarens: And you can read our blog post describing the work to the Nature Sustainability Community here: https://t.co/ebiOpjEkyi…
UVA professors probe Food-energy-water implications of negative emissions technologies, trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UVAEngineers @bill_shobe @UVACooperCenter https://t.co/I1U3UYGgjD
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
Direct Air Capture promises to be a crucial building block for +1.5 degree future. Our new paper in @NatureClimate discusses major trade-offs associated with Negative Emission Technology deployment in food supply, energy demand, and water use. https://t.co
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
And you can read our blog post describing the work to the Nature Sustainability Community here: https://t.co/ebiOpjEkyi
Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to make to deploy carbon dioxide removal needed to achieve +1.5ºC of warming https://t.co/FPwjWx4yFp https://t.co/i0sc7Z7qQQ