RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
Very interesting 👇🏻 #CDR
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
CLIMATE CHANGE / CLIMATE BREAKDOWN / GLOBAL HEATING / CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION & HALTING GLOBAL HEATING / NEGATIVE EMISSIONS TECHNOLOGY / IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURE / FOOD PRICE INFLATION:
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
Looking only at the figure, the conclusions that emerge from it do not make much sense
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
Useful thread, important kicker: “There is no substitute for near-term decarbonization.”
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so strain water and land use the price of food would triple in South Asia and quintuple in sub-Saharan Africa. 1.5C is, practically, a beyon
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @UVACooperCenter: UVA professors and researchers Jay Fuhrman, Bill Shobe, Scott Doney and Andres Clarens are co-authors of the article p…
RT @gcarbonproject: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/GPXC…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @RogueChocolate: “This could result in staple food crop prices rising by approximately fivefold relative to 2010 levels in many parts of…
RT @RogueChocolate: “This could result in staple food crop prices rising by approximately fivefold relative to 2010 levels in many parts of…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @amckinstry: Important to grasp this: there is a direct link between cutting energy needs in Ireland (eg moving from cars to active tran…
Important to grasp this: there is a direct link between cutting energy needs in Ireland (eg moving from cars to active transport, cycling), saving lives meeting by meeting climate goals, and being able to feed everybody.
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…
RT @pepcanadell: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/FAzKOfD…