Harga Beras Indonesia Paling Mahal Se-ASEAN dalam 10 Tahun Terakhir
RT @FreyaZaborski: DAC also known as Direct Air Capture is a form of a negative emissions technology (go have a look back at our thread 2 w…
@geoengineering1
DAC also known as Direct Air Capture is a form of a negative emissions technology (go have a look back at our thread 2 weeks ago (if you can’t remember!). Fuhrman explores the drawbacks and benefits of DAC in his paper which can be accessed here: https://t
@Peters_Glen @bataille_chris @RichardTol Exhibit C: without IAMs, how would we know BECCS driven 1.5C would result in 80% higher crop prices compared to DACCS driven 1.5C?(And the water withdrawal that exacerbates water scarcity?) https://t.co/XN627mxMug
https://t.co/GrIl4rK1Se This @Nature paper uses the Global Change Assessment Model (#GCAM) to assess the potential for #DirectAirCapture in alleviating the impact of #NETs on the environment when used at global scales. #CarbonCapture #CarbonDioxde #DAC #
Interesting 2020 article shows how many basic questions about NETs have yet to be carefully considered, & emphasizes of course "the need for urgent action on decarbonization policy that is the precondition for any kind of large-scale mitigation activit
Jos ilmastotoimet nojaavat bioenergiaan hiilentalteenotolla, ruuan hinta nousisi rajusti ja eniten siellä missä siihen on vähiten varaa. #vmp https://t.co/vB499hXkrC https://t.co/2EGO2CX2RW
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @ScottDoney1: @_david_ho_ Also need to compare land use of other alternatives. See paper by @MkClim8Gr8Again @andresclarens https://t.co…
@Green_Sky_Think @crisortunity 💯 Btw, did you see this paper - relevant for scaling synfuels (or reversing fossil kerosene emissions) https://t.co/44lpp0Q1j6
@ryankatzrosene Did you see this one too? https://t.co/44lpp0Q1j6
RT @arvindpawan1: Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment.…
RT @arvindpawan1: Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment.…
RT @arvindpawan1: Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment.…
RT @arvindpawan1: Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment.…
RT @arvindpawan1: Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment.…
RT @arvindpawan1: Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment.…
RT @arvindpawan1: Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment.…
RT @arvindpawan1: Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment.…
RT @arvindpawan1: Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment.…
RT @arvindpawan1: Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment.…
I’m so looking forward to reading this paper in full and thinking through global justice implications of how we scale (or don’t) these practices. One thing is clear; direct emissions reductions as quickly as possible is needed to reduce future impact of NE
Missed this earlier but important paper from @andresclarens et al. on equity implications of large-scale NET deployment. They find NETs can especially increase food prices five-fold in the Global South. They also discuss relative trades b/n DAC & BECCS
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @thermokarst: Counting on expensive, unproven carbon capture techniques will likely have large negative effects on food and water. Rapid…
RT @thermokarst: Counting on expensive, unproven carbon capture techniques will likely have large negative effects on food and water. Rapid…
RT @thermokarst: Counting on expensive, unproven carbon capture techniques will likely have large negative effects on food and water. Rapid…
Counting on expensive, unproven carbon capture techniques will likely have large negative effects on food and water. Rapidly transitioning to affordable, renewable energy will clean our air, create jobs, and protect the environment. #ThePowerIsYours https:
This combines our previously published paper on the trade-offs associated with Negative Emission Technology deployment in food supply, energy demand, and water use. https://t.co/PgjwIsKEBg https://t.co/WsdSpCHm1U
@LEMVet @AukeHoekstra @MargrietKuijper @mjunginger @HenriBontenbal @marjanminnesma @SvVeldhoven @MatthijsSienot @TomvanderLee @HeleendeConinck @KornelisBlok Bovendien, de torenhoge beloftes van CCS gaan voorbij aan vele negatieve externaliteiten, en dat is
@mathijs_boom @HenriBontenbal "This could result in staple food crop prices rising by approximately fivefold relative to 2010 levels in many parts of the Global South, raising equity concerns about the deployment of NETs." https://t.co/kHdyZLUGKN
@noahqk @bradplumer @AkshatRathi Net zero CO2 can theoretically achieved with complete stop in fossil fuel combustion. But net zero GHG presupposes large scale CO2 removal technology. And so my shameless plug on our net negative emissions paper: https:/
@HTuohi Tarkkaa määrää vaikea itse sanoa, tässä syytä kuunnella luonto- ja ilmastotutkijoita. Artikkeli mielessä siis tämä, toki muitakin on. Tässä näkökulma negatiivisten päästöjen toteutuksen seurauksissa. https://t.co/BsF7qea9d7
RT @jpjmarti: Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi…
RT @jpjmarti: Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi…
RT @jpjmarti: Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi…
RT @jpjmarti: Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi…
RT @jpjmarti: Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi…
RT @jpjmarti: Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi…
RT @jpjmarti: Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi…
RT @jpjmarti: Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi…
RT @jpjmarti: Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi…
RT @jpjmarti: Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi…
Bioenergia hiilen talteenotolla on taikatemppu mihin moni 1.5 asteen skenaario nojaa. Nyt joku jaksoi arvioida mitä se voisi tarkoittaa ruuan hinnalle. Yli 5x nousu heille joilla on siihen vähiten varaa. #fail https://t.co/SlQcfpWw9r https://t.co/ipNK5QsCy
RT @wang_seaver: New @NatureClimate paper assesses direct air carbon capture to have a potential to capture 7% of global CO2 emissions, but…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @iklimBU: 📜 Yayında konuştuğumuz makaleler: "Current and future global climate impacts resulting from #COVID19" https://t.co/zuJYjCbWVb…
RT @iklimBU: 📜 Yayında konuştuğumuz makaleler: "Current and future global climate impacts resulting from #COVID19" https://t.co/zuJYjCbWVb…
RT @iklimBU: 📜 Yayında konuştuğumuz makaleler: "Current and future global climate impacts resulting from #COVID19" https://t.co/zuJYjCbWVb…
RT @iklimBU: 📜 Yayında konuştuğumuz makaleler: "Current and future global climate impacts resulting from #COVID19" https://t.co/zuJYjCbWVb…
📜 Yayında konuştuğumuz makaleler: "Current and future global climate impacts resulting from #COVID19" https://t.co/zuJYjCbWVb "Food-energy-water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future" https://t.co/hm1jYCNrBr @leventkurnaz @
https://t.co/3AGPXBGS0d This could result in staple food crop prices rising by approximately fivefold relative to 2010 levels in many parts of the Global South...once again the poor and working class get it in the neck from a grandstanding virtue signallin
RT @howarth_cornell: An important read. We should not count on carbon capture. We need to move away from fossil fuels to #renewables AS…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…
RT @climateMorrow: Very cool new modeling paper on food, energy & water implications of direct air capture in GCAM from @JayFuhrman7, @3y41…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @3y419: Direct Air Capture promises to be a crucial building block for +1.5 degree future. Our new paper in @NatureClimate discusses maj…
RT @andresclarens: And you can read our blog post describing the work to the Nature Sustainability Community here: https://t.co/ebiOpjEkyi
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @climateMorrow: Very cool new modeling paper on food, energy & water implications of direct air capture in GCAM from @JayFuhrman7, @3y41…
RT @gcarbonproject: Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future @NatureClimate https://t.co/GPXC…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
Excellent work by @andresclarens and colleagues elucidating benefits and trade-offs of CO2 removal using direct air capture. My biggest takeaways: 1. No substitute for near-term decarbonization. 2. DAC or BECCS, we're going to need a *lot* of water.
RT @gnievchenko: Interesting paper exploring the secondary effects of carbon negative technologies. Equity issue around DAC is particularly…
👇🏽
Very cool new modeling paper on food, energy & water implications of direct air capture in GCAM from @JayFuhrman7, @3y419, Pralit Patel, @ScottDoney1, William Shobe & @andresclarens https://t.co/k5PbCSywgk
RT @howarth_cornell: An important read. We should not count on carbon capture. We need to move away from fossil fuels to #renewables AS…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @howarth_cornell: An important read. We should not count on carbon capture. We need to move away from fossil fuels to #renewables AS…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
An important read. We should not count on carbon capture. We need to move away from fossil fuels to #renewables ASAP.
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
Interesting paper exploring the secondary effects of carbon negative technologies. Equity issue around DAC is particularly worrying. https://t.co/l1gWf1KqAm
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @ThomasGibon: Negative emission technologies (bioenergy with CCS and direct air capture) need to be deployed quickly at the GtCO2-scale…
Negative emission technologies (bioenergy with CCS and direct air capture) need to be deployed quickly at the GtCO2-scale if we want to limit global warming to "manageable" levels. The more we wait, the more expensive in dollars, but also in food, energy,
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @LeJDLE: Et si les technologies suceuses du CO2 superflu déstabilisaient les marchés mondiaux des denrées alimentaires ? Certains le cra…
Et si les technologies suceuses du CO2 superflu déstabilisaient les marchés mondiaux des denrées alimentaires ? Certains le craignent. https://t.co/sTh4MGr8Hk
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @andresclarens: Excited to share our new paper in @NatureClimate that explores the food, energy, and water tradeoffs we would have to ma…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @dwallacewells: A new paper suggests the use of negative-emissions technologies to stabilize the planet's temperature at 1.5C would so s…
RT @ScottDoney1: Direct air capture use for carbon mitigation sets up food-water-energy trade-offs @JayFuhrman7 @andresclarens @UVA_ESE @UV…