↓ Skip to main content

Consistent differences in a virtual world model of ape societies

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Consistent differences in a virtual world model of ape societies
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-70955-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bart J. Wilson, Sarah F. Brosnan, Elizabeth V. Lonsdorf, Crickette M. Sanz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 15 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Psychology 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,744,514
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#16,307
of 142,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,962
of 426,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#468
of 3,813 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,813 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.