| Title |
Conductivity control via minimally invasive anti-Frenkel defects in a functional oxide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Materials, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41563-020-0765-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald M. Evans, Theodor S. Holstad, Aleksander B. Mosberg, Didrik R. Småbråten, Per Erik Vullum, Anup L. Dadlani, Konstantin Shapovalov, Zewu Yan, Edith Bourret, David Gao, Jaakko Akola, Jan Torgersen, Antonius T. J. van Helvoort, Sverre M. Selbach, Dennis Meier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| India | 2 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 15 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 18 | 33% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#594,977
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#593
of 4,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,771
of 427,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#24
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.