↓ Skip to main content

A methodological review of resilience measurement scales

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 2,297)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
22 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1430 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2429 Mendeley
Title
A methodological review of resilience measurement scales
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-9-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gill Windle, Kate M Bennett, Jane Noyes

Abstract

The evaluation of interventions and policies designed to promote resilience, and research to understand the determinants and associations, require reliable and valid measures to ensure data quality. This paper systematically reviews the psychometric rigour of resilience measurement scales developed for use in general and clinical populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 <1%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 13 <1%
Unknown 2370 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 404 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 399 16%
Researcher 246 10%
Student > Bachelor 220 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 196 8%
Other 475 20%
Unknown 489 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 769 32%
Social Sciences 289 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 255 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 111 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 104 4%
Other 333 14%
Unknown 568 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#619,845
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#15
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,654
of 194,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them