Title |
A methodological review of resilience measurement scales
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-9-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gill Windle, Kate M Bennett, Jane Noyes |
Abstract |
The evaluation of interventions and policies designed to promote resilience, and research to understand the determinants and associations, require reliable and valid measures to ensure data quality. This paper systematically reviews the psychometric rigour of resilience measurement scales developed for use in general and clinical populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
United States | 4 | 18% |
China | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Hungary | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
Scientists | 9 | 41% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
Spain | 6 | <1% |
Australia | 3 | <1% |
Canada | 3 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 13 | <1% |
Unknown | 2370 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 404 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 399 | 16% |
Researcher | 246 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 220 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 196 | 8% |
Other | 475 | 20% |
Unknown | 489 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 769 | 32% |
Social Sciences | 289 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 255 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 111 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 104 | 4% |
Other | 333 | 14% |
Unknown | 568 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#619,845
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#15
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,654
of 194,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them